[comp.sys.mac.programmer] THINK C++

mark@intek01.UUCP (Mark McWiggins) (12/20/89)

Anyway ... what I'd really like is a Think C++, with no 32K limit and true
C++ compatibility (at least thru version 1.2; I could live without multiple
inheritance if I had to.)  The current object support in Think C 4.0 is
not encouraging in this respect, being close enough to look like C++, but
different enough to be confusing/incompatible.

I seem to recall this being hashed thru in this group a few months back,
but (a) I wasn't paying very close attention at the time and (b) perhaps
the Think-ers have something new to report?  I'd really like to use a
Think compiler, but the current one won't work for me without more trouble
than I can afford.

-- 
Mark McWiggins			Integration Technologies, Inc. (Intek)
+1 206 455 9935			DISCLAIMER:  I could be wrong ...
1400 112th Ave SE #202		Bellevue WA  98004
uunet!intek01!mark		Ask me about C++!

jxf@procyon.cis.ksu.edu (Jerry Frain) (07/07/90)

I hate to bring this up again, but does anyone have any idea as to whether
Symantec is planning actually making a THINK C that is C++ compatible?

I'm working on a project right now to do operations on matricies, and it
sure would be nice to have a full C++ implementation (nope, I can't afford
MPW C++) to create my matrix class, and define the operations that can
be performed on a matrix.

The THINK C TCL is pretty nifty for fast & neat programming of typical
user-friendly applications in the Mac environment, but when it comes
right down to doing a down & dirty, highly specialized application in
which it would be nice to design some highly specialized classes,
THINK C just doesn't fit the bill.

I'm actually considering doing this program on our Suns at the university,
simply because this project fits would be an ideal C++ implementation, and
THINK C OOP falls far short.

So how 'bout it?  Anyone got an angle on whether THINK C++ is in the
planning stages (at least)?

Or even better, does anyone have any suggestions which might make this
project of mine less painful to do in THINK C OOP?

--
Jerry Frain -- Perpetual Student		Kansas State University
                                 	Department of Computing & Info Sciences
Internet : jxf@ksuvax1.cis.ksu.edu                Manhattan, Kansas
UUCP     : ...!{rutgers,textbell}!ksuvax1!jxf

news@calgary.uucp (Network News Manager) (07/08/90)

Hiya,
From: sharp@cpsc.ucalgary.ca (Maurice Sharp)
Path: cpsc!sharp

     Someone has posted stuff for ThinkC/C++ compatibility. I have a
copy of it, but I am not sure where I got it. I have included the
email info hear so you can ask the person who wrote it.

	maurice

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have any questions, feel free to send me e-mail. And, if you've
got
some suggestions and improvements, please send them along!! I hope
someone
finds this stuff useful. Enjoy!!
 
* Isaac J. Salzman					      ----
* The RAND Corporation - Information Sciences Dept.	     /o o/  /
* 1700 Main St., PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90406-2138    | v |  |
* AT&T	    : +1 213-393-0411 x6421 or x7923 (ISL lab)	    _|	 |_/
* Internet  : salzman@rand.org				   / |	 |
* UUCP	    : !uunet!rand.org!salzman			   | |	 |
* CompuServe: 76167,1046
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Maurice Sharp MSc. Student (403) 220 7690
University of Calgary Computer Science Department
2500 University Drive N.W.	      sharp@cpsc.UCalgary.CA
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4	      GEnie M.SHARP5