bowman@reed.UUCP (Eric Bowman) (05/31/91)
Every few months or so I waste a day trying to get the !@#$! dump and load
C++ options to work, but I can't seem to make any progress. Was this every
resolved?
OK: I'm running
MPW Shell v. 3.2b8 (system 6.0.5, Mac II)
MPW CFront v. 3.1
MPW C v. 3.2b1
Link v. 3.1
All destructors are declared virtual; most classes don't define any destructor,
those that do are derived from PtrObject.
(I'm not using MacApp at all.)
Everything compiles fine; Link returns the following error:
### While reading file ":SymObj:TApplication.cp.o"
### Link: Error: Bad object file: (Error 89) inconsistent declaration of a file
object
### Link: Errors prevented normal completion.
Anyone know what this means?
aTdHvAaNnKcSe,
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
BoBo Ready, Willing, & Abelian
bowman@reed.{edu,bitnet,uucp}
"I think that there is a moral to this story, namely that it is more important
to have beauty in one's equations than to have them fit experiment." - Diracml27192@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Mark Lanett) (05/31/91)
bowman@reed.UUCP (Eric Bowman) writes: >Every few months or so I waste a day trying to get the !@#$! dump and load >C++ options to work, but I can't seem to make any progress. Was this every >resolved? >OK: I'm running > MPW Shell v. 3.2b8 (system 6.0.5, Mac II) ^^^^^ > MPW CFront v. 3.1 > MPW C v. 3.2b1 > Link v. 3.1 ^^^ If you're running the 3.2 Shell, you need to be running Link 3.2, which came on the Beta 4 SEED CD. If you don't have access to it bug Apple to get a final release of MPW 3.2 out. -- //----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Lanett ml27192@uxa.cs.uiuc.edu Software Tools Group, NCSA mlanett@ncsa.uiuc.edu I'm not an idiot; I just play one on the net.
d88-jwa@byse.nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte) (05/31/91)
.edu> ml27192@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Mark Lanett) writes: > MPW Shell v. 3.2b8 (system 6.0.5, Mac II) ^^^^^ have access to it bug Apple to get a final release of MPW 3.2 out. I was under the impression that MPW 3.2 was final ? There's a very "final-looking" release on the A/UX development tools beta CD some developers received at the WWDC. (Those tools are great, except for a few bugs, one of them serious but probably fixable now that I've found it - that's what beta software's for, after all :-) -- Jon W{tte h+@nada.kth.se - Speed !
bowman@reed.UUCP (Eric Bowman) (06/01/91)
In article <1991May31.051253.21316@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> ml27192@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Mark Lanett) writes: >If you're running the 3.2 Shell, >you need to be running Link 3.2, which came on the Beta 4 SEED CD. If you don't >have access to it bug Apple to get a final release of MPW 3.2 out. Does this mean I could just go back to the 3.1 shell and everything would be groovy? thanks, -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= BoBo Ready, Willing, & Abelian bowman@reed.{edu,bitnet,uucp} "I think that there is a moral to this story, namely that it is more important to have beauty in one's equations than to have them fit experiment." - Dirac
ksand@apple.com (Kent Sandvik) (06/01/91)
In article <16448@reed.UUCP>, bowman@reed.UUCP (Eric Bowman) writes: > > Every few months or so I waste a day trying to get the !@#$! dump and load > C++ options to work, but I can't seem to make any progress. Was this every > resolved? > > OK: I'm running > > MPW Shell v. 3.2b8 (system 6.0.5, Mac II) > MPW CFront v. 3.1 > MPW C v. 3.2b1 > Link v. 3.1 > > All destructors are declared virtual; most classes don't define any destructor, > those that do are derived from PtrObject. > Everything compiles fine; Link returns the following error: > > ### While reading file ":SymObj:TApplication.cp.o" > ### Link: Error: Bad object file: (Error 89) inconsistent declaration of a file > object > ### Link: Errors prevented normal completion. Are you using MPW 3.2 libraries, or MPW 3.1 ones? It usually makes sense not to mix and match different releases, if there is not a need (like one needs the MPW 3.2 C compiler for the load/dump feature). Another typical load/dump problem is that the base class is not defined as public in the inherited classes, which makes it hard to find information for load/dump, but I don't know if this is your problem. Kent Sandvik
ml27192@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Mark Lanett) (06/01/91)
d88-jwa@byse.nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte) writes: >I was under the impression that MPW 3.2 was final ? There's a very >"final-looking" release on the A/UX development tools beta CD some >developers received at the WWDC. (Those tools are great, except for Wonderfull. We have a site license for MPW here, but haven't seen 3.2. Of course we wouldn't have seen the 3.2 beta if it weren't on the SEED CD. >a few bugs, one of them serious but probably fixable now that I've >found it - that's what beta software's for, after all :-) >-- > Jon W{tte > h+@nada.kth.se > - Speed ! -- //----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Lanett ml27192@uxa.cs.uiuc.edu Software Tools Group, NCSA mlanett@ncsa.uiuc.edu I'm not an idiot; I just play one on the net.
ksand@apple.com (Kent Sandvik) (06/01/91)
In article <1991Jun1.043822.15731@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, ml27192@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Mark Lanett) writes: > > d88-jwa@byse.nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte) writes: > >I was under the impression that MPW 3.2 was final ? There's a very > >"final-looking" release on the A/UX development tools beta CD some > >developers received at the WWDC. (Those tools are great, except for > Wonderfull. We have a site license for MPW here, but haven't seen 3.2. Of > course we wouldn't have seen the 3.2 beta if it weren't on the SEED CD. FYI, MPW 3.2 will be first released on the next ETO#4 CD, to be released really real soon now. As for any kind of possible A/UX development tools beta CD, as the name implies it's beta. Kent Sandvik
jess@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Jess M Holle) (06/02/91)
In article <1991Jun1.043822.15731@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> ml27192@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Mark Lanett) writes: >Wonderfull. We have a site license for MPW here, but haven't seen 3.2. Of >course we wouldn't have seen the 3.2 beta if it weren't on the SEED CD. Does anyone know when MPW 3.2 will be coming out? I really want to upgrade to Sys 7.0, but I also want to do programming. I am an APDA member, but not a registered develop or the like, but just a hobbyist. When can I get a hold of a Sys 7.0 compatible version. Will registered owners of MPW 3.1 get sent a notice? Jess Holle