jcj@virtech.uucp (Jeff Jones) (06/17/91)
jcj@virtech.uucp (Jeff Jones) (That's Me!) writes: >A friend of mine is wanting to get involved with LISP on the Mac, and >wants to know the Net's attitude about what's good, what's not, if >there is anything out there, etc. As a short summary, the net.consensus seems to be that Apple's very own common LISP (v2.0 now in beta stage) is very good. It runs under MPW, for those of you who would be interested. A couple of people saw what will be the next/newest/latest release at the WWDC, and were suitably impressed. I got lot's of responses, so instead of emailing thanks, once again: >Thanks to all! -- Jeff Jones uunet!virtech!jcj Virtual Technologies, Inc. 46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160 Sterling, VA 22170 (703) 430 9247 Go Mojos!
ksand@apple.com (Kent Sandvik) (06/19/91)
In article <1991Jun17.150347.3439@virtech.uucp>, jcj@virtech.uucp (Jeff Jones) writes: > > jcj@virtech.uucp (Jeff Jones) (That's Me!) writes: > >A friend of mine is wanting to get involved with LISP on the Mac, and > >wants to know the Net's attitude about what's good, what's not, if > >there is anything out there, etc. > > As a short summary, the net.consensus seems to be that Apple's very own > common LISP (v2.0 now in beta stage) is very good. It runs under MPW, for > those of you who would be interested. A couple of people saw what will be > the next/newest/latest release at the WWDC, and were suitably impressed. A small correction, Macintosh Common Lisp is a standalone environment, but one could call MPW compiler generated functions/code from MCL. Kent Sandvik