[comp.sources.games.bugs] xconq, xconq, who's got the xconq

eh@cs.columbia.edu (Erik Hilsdale) (06/15/91)

I just reread through this whole xconq thread, and I found that there's
been no answer to the original question (which I didn't pose):

Where is xconq (not Conquer)?  Is there an FTP site I can glom it from?

apologies for the straightforwardness..

-eh

peter@suntan.viewlogic.com (Peter Colby) (06/15/91)

In article <1991Jun14.180620.719@cs.columbia.edu>, eh@cs.columbia.edu (Erik Hilsdale) writes:
|> I just reread through this whole xconq thread, and I found that there's
|> been no answer to the original question (which I didn't pose):
|> 
|> Where is xconq (not Conquer)?  Is there an FTP site I can glom it from?
|> 
|> apologies for the straightforwardness..
|> 
|> -eh
	I, myself, would have answered if I knew. But since I didn't (and
still don't) someone else will have to respond.
	Sorry
-- 
      (O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)     (O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)
      (O) !the doctor is out! (O)     (0) peter@viewlogic.com (0)
      (O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)     (O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)

parody@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Great Steeve [Magician at Large]) (06/16/91)

Try ftp'ing from uunet.uu.net (sorry, don't know the numbers).
There is an archive for games on there with index files... Search
& thou shalt find...

In the dark ages peter@suntan.viewlogic.com (Peter Colby) wrote:
-->In article <1991Jun14.180620.719@cs.columbia.edu>, Erik Hilsdale writes:
-->|> I just reread through this whole xconq thread, and I found that there's
-->|> been no answer to the original question (which I didn't pose):
-->|> 
-->|> Where is xconq (not Conquer)?  Is there an FTP site I can glom it from?
-->|> 
-->|> apologies for the straightforwardness..
-->|> 
-->|> -eh
-->	I, myself, would have answered if I knew. But since I didn't (and
-->still don't) someone else will have to respond.
-->	Sorry
-->-- 
-->      (O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)     (O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)
-->      (O) !the doctor is out! (O)     (0) peter@viewlogic.com (0)
-->      (O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)     (O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)(O)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
parody@ucscb.ucsc.EDU  	      (UC Santa Cruz hasn't a clue what I'm up to)
--Steeven M. Vawter			Telephone: (408) 426-2137
Alternates: leopard@hyperion.COM --or-- leopard@gorn.santa-cruz.ca.us

allan@eskimo.celestial.com (Christopher Stewart) (06/16/91)

The last time I checked mgse had a copy of xconq, but the last time I looked
was over a year ago. Which brings me to the question I have. After
reading this discussion, I realize I'm under a mis-impression of xconq.
I thought xconq was an X-window version of conquer. I see that it being
related to conquer is untrue, now I am wondering if it is a X-window or
curses based game or both?
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gopher Stew                             | allan@eskimo.celestial.com
The Rodent King                         | ...!uw-beaver!fluke!dyndata
                                        |    !eskimo!allan
\|/                                     |
oOo  <--- {his paw mark and Royal Seal} |

ameiba@reed.edu (06/17/91)

In article <1991Jun14.180620.719@cs.columbia.edu> eh@douglass.columbia.edu (Erik Hilsdale) writes:
>I just reread through this whole xconq thread, and I found that there's
>been no answer to the original question (which I didn't pose):

Well, I did pose the original question, and I got a multitude of answers....

>Where is xconq (not Conquer)?  Is there an FTP site I can glom it from?

The most modified version is at paul.rutgers.edu, 128.6.5.60, in /pub/xconq.
It doesn't allow as many computer players as some others, and one or two
commands are missing (like "wait until a transport shows up then board it",
which I liked), but it does allow simultaneous players, moving the center of
action doesn't cause pieces to disappear, and the computer player is NASTY.
Attempting to attack a computer player's island  with anything short of a
battleship, a nuclear bomb or a sneak attack is inadvisable.  And sneak
attacks don't occur very often.

So, to be blunt--I, the original question-asker, have decided to use the file
/pub/xconq/xc5.4.4-27-91.tar.Z from paul.rutgers.edu.  But I would dearly
love to beta-test xconq 5.5, which Stan Shebs (the original xconq god) has
announced the imminent release of.

	Keith Steiger
	ameiba@reed.edu
	"Now if only I could read news from my own machine again...."

joe@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (Joe Judge) (06/19/91)

In article <m0jpD62-0001P0C@dharma.reed.edu> ameiba@reed.edu (Keith Steiger) writes:
>In article <1991Jun14.180620.719@cs.columbia.edu> eh@douglass.columbia.edu (Erik Hilsdale) writes:
>                                                     But I would dearly
>love to beta-test xconq 5.5, which Stan Shebs (the original xconq god) has
>announced the imminent release of.
>
>	Keith Steiger


	I would dearly love to beta the Mac version :) ... 

	I spent a week converting the small X bitmaps to Mac SICN's and
	worked on making the Xconq from paul.rutgers.edu a lot more 
	dynamic in it's memory allocation (instead of HUGE arrays of big 
	structs :) a while back. I guess I put it on hold and it stayed 
	there - sigh.

	- joe