[comp.music] Fruitful research areas - summary

monro_g@maths.su.oz.au (05/25/90)

I asked a little while ago for references to good research in the area of 
comp.music, and also for fruitful topics for graduate students.

All the replies to the net were collected neatly in Music-Research Digest
Vol. 5 #46, so I won't repeat them here.  Stephen Page also sent me a copy 
of his reply.  Additionally, Dean.Rubine@CS.CMU.EDU sent me a long and
helpful reply, much of which is reproduced below.  There was no response 
from one or two people who have told us at length about bad research and 
fruitless research areas.

Thanks to everyone who responded.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

From Dean Rubine:

>I've worked in the following subfields, all of which, IMHO, have some good
>research going on (I'm basically a technical person):
>
>	A. Analysis/Synthesis of instrument tones
>	B. Digital Signal Processing
>	C. New Instrument Interfaces
>	D. Real Time MIDI performance interfaces
>	D. Languages for Computer Music/Real Time Control
>
>As for references, I'll give a few, but there are lots more.
>
>	CMJ=Computer Music Journal
>	ICMC=Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference
>	JAES=Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
>
>Analysis/Synthesis of instrument tones:
>	Moorer, CMJ 1(1)
>	Chowning, JAES 21(#?) July/Aug 73
>	J. Smith & X. Serra, ICMC 87
>	Karplus & Strong  CMJ??
>	X. Rodet (CHANT program, and FOF) CMJ ?(?)
>	M. Serra JAES 38(3)
>
>Digital Signal Processing
>	Moorer CMJ 1(1)
>	Moorer "About this Reverberation Business", Foundations of Computer
>		Music, Roads  & Strawn, Eds
>	J. Smith ICMC 85 "...Waveguides..."
>
>New Instrument Interfaces
>	All of CMJ 14(1), for example
>
>Real Time MIDI performance interfaces
>	Dannenberg, "...computer accompaniment..."  ICMC87, ICMC85(??)
>	(maybe "Bloch and Dannenberg", don't have it handy)
>	X. Chabot ??
>
>Languages for Computer Music/Real Time Control
>	Mathews (The Music "N" languages) (No reference handy)
>	Dannenberg et al, "Arctic...", CMJ 10(4)
>	Dannenberg "Canon", CMJ???, "Fugue" ICMC89
>

[Some fruitful topics for graduate students]

>In the technical fields, computer music grad students come in two flavors,
>either electrical engineers, or computer scientists.  EEs like to build low
>level hardware and/or do software signal-processing or synthesis.  CS types
>like to do interactive MIDI stuff, algorithmic composition, and languages and
>operating systems.  As for specific topics, pick a nice big open problem, and
>go after the pieces.  As an example, real-time human/computer improvisation
>involves 
>
>	1. Tracking of human instrumental input
>		use a MIDI device or monophonic pitch detector
>		RESEARCH AREA: polyphonic pitch tracking to MIDI
>	2. Extraction of beat information from input
>		RESEARCH AREA: A computer "foot tapper" which given, e.g.
>			MIDI input, determines where the downbeats are
>	3. Real-time harmonic analyis
>		RESEARCH AREA: Given MIDI input (and maybe some style
>		assumptions), produce chord charts as output
>	4. Real-time composition
>		RESEARCH AREA: Given a "lead sheet" produce an accompaniment
>		in real-time
>
>    Other big problems which can be similarly broken up are computerized aids
>to transcription (e.g. input: recording; output: sheet music), score editing
>(sub-issues of music representation, user interfaces, ...) and, with all the
>fast hardware that's appearing, doing some of the new synthesis algorithms
>(e.g. physical models) in real-time with real-time human gestural control is
>also becoming feasible.  I could easily go on, but you can get just as many
>ideas by reading the tables of contents to recent (or not-so-recent) CMJs and
>ICMC proceedings.  

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Gordon Monro
  University of Sydney.    Internet: monro_g@maths.su.oz.au

eliot@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Eliot Handelman) (05/26/90)

In article <1990May25.090038.20344@metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU> monro_g@maths.su.oz.au () writes:
;I asked a little while ago for references to good research in the area of 
;comp.music, and also for fruitful topics for graduate students.

;                                                   There was no response 
;from one or two people who have told us at length about bad research and 
;fruitless research areas.

I assume you mean me. 


A Fruitful Research Area: There is today growing concern with the need 
  for a new information-processing metaphor, and major corporations
  are expressing interest in science-fiction author W. Gibson's concept 
  of "cyberspace," in which information is given form as a "consensual 
  hallucination" mapped out directly in the operator's mind via direct 
  brain stimulation.  The metaphor to date has been strictly visual. 
  Part I of your PhD project is to describe and implement (a simulation 
  will do) the auditory analogue of this metaphor. Justify the metaphor 
  with references to L. Beethoven, R. Wagner, J. Baudrillard, E. Bloch, 
  H.R. Jauss, U. Eco, J. Kristeva and I. Xenakis. For part II of your 
  PhD project you must write a concerto for midi piano and large orchestra 
  with concertante piano and rock percussion. You must then find an 
  orchestra, copy all of the parts and conduct it yourself.

smoliar@vaxa.isi.edu (Stephen Smoliar) (05/26/90)

In article <1990May25.090038.20344@metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU> monro_g@maths.su.oz.au
() writes:
>  There was no response 
>from one or two people who have told us at length about bad research and 
>fruitless research areas.
>
MEA CULPA, Gordon!  However, there is a reason for my silence, which is that I
believe that graduate students should only venture into this area with proper
guidance and supervision.  I once observed a very sad experience in which a
graduate student had one advisor in computer science and another in music.
He was able to keep each very happy as long as they did not talk to each other!
I was the unfortunate agent who closed the loop of communication, and it became
quickly apparent that this student really did not have the musical competence
for the project he had proposed.  My feeling is that until we have some faculty
who are qualified to supervise such research (that is, qualified as individuals
to take responsibility for ALL aspects of the research, whether they involve
computers, music, psychology, or even brain science) it is a BIG MISTAKE to
encourage graduate students to go looking for topics in the field.  One of the
reasons I report at great length about "bad research and fruitless research
areas" is in the hope that others will not make similar mistakes.

=========================================================================

USPS:	Stephen Smoliar
	USC Information Sciences Institute
	4676 Admiralty Way  Suite 1001
	Marina del Rey, California  90292-6695

Internet:  smoliar@vaxa.isi.edu

"By long custom, social discourse in Cambridge is intended to impart and only
rarely to obtain information.  People talk;  it is not expected that anyone
will listen.  A respectful show of attention is all that is required until
the listener takes over in his or her turn.  No one has ever been known to
repeat what he or she has heard at a party or other social gathering."
					John Kenneth Galbraith
					A TENURED PROFESSOR