[comp.music] Sampler

sk1y+@andrew.cmu.edu (Shuntaro Kawakami) (04/06/91)

Does anyone know what the cheaperest sampler is?  If you do, what is the price?

zerobeat@intacc.uucp (Ferenc Szabo) (04/10/91)

In article <UbzAmHu00UhBE3b40I@andrew.cmu.edu> sk1y+@andrew.cmu.edu (Shuntaro Kawakami)  writes:

>
>Does anyone know what the cheaperest sampler is?  If you do, what is the price?
The cheapest sampler is the Casio SK-1 for maybe $200. Radio Shack also sells
virtually the same machine but with their name on it.  Maybe the American
price is a lot lower.  This sampler is very,very limited and unless you really
like the novelty of that 'piece of sh@@' sound (it has it's place for sure)
you might want something a bit more expensive but way more versatile and
better sounding.
The Mirage sampler came can be had for probabl
y $600 at the most and is way more versatile.  However, it pales in comparison
to samplers like the Roland S50,S330, Akai S900,S950 or even Yamaha and Korg's
samplers (# unknown, but they only make 1).  These machines can be had for
$900 probably and are way, way better than the Mirage.

Contrast this with the Emulator 1.  It came out in 1982 for $8,000.  The
Mirage even at the original 1986 price of $2000? was in many ways a better
machine.

      ferenc

knid%midiline.uucp@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Vermicious Knid) (04/11/91)

You might also check out used 12-bit samplers, such as the Akai S612, the 
Mirage (as previously mentioned), the S-10 and the S-50.  I see these for 
sale all the time (I also have an Akai S612) for around $350-600.

ah2e+@andrew.cmu.edu (Aaron Noel Hughes) (04/11/91)

>Contrast this with the Emulator 1.  It came out in 1982 for $8,000.  The
>Mirage even at the original 1986 price of $2000? was in many ways a >better
>machine.

>      ferenc

Let's not forget here that there is a *4* year technology difference
between the two machines.  Just like comparing the Mirage to almost any
sampler today makes the Mirage look like a toy.

=>B^)

Aaron

lance@motcsd.csd.mot.com (lance.norskog) (04/12/91)

In article <UbzAmHu00UhBE3b40I@andrew.cmu.edu> sk1y+@andrew.cmu.edu (Shuntaro Kawakami)  writes:

>
>Does anyone know what the cheaperest sampler is?  If you do, what is the price?

Meridian Data in San Jose (USA: 408-555-1212 for phone # information)
sells something called the SoundByte.

This is a $499 sound sampler that talks to a PC via a parallel port.
I can't remember if it's 12- or 16-bit sound.  So, if you already have
a computer rig and a large hard disk, this might be a nice sampling
module for your system.  I don't know if it samples in real-time.
It also plays back.  Again, I don't know if it's real-time.  It has
some sort of DSP chip on-board, but I don't know if you can download
your own software.

Lance Norskog

copley-devon@cs.yale.edu (Devon M. Copley) (04/15/91)

Unfortunately, the Akai S-612, and the Roland S-10 both use those 
ABYSMAL 2.8 inch "Quick Disks";  I would strongly recommend against
buying into that awful non-standard format.  It takes FOUR of the
little suckers just to load the S-10's tiny memory!  Almost makes
you wish for a cassette interface...

And the Mirage is 8-bit, not 12, as is (I believe) the S-612.

Personally I wouldn't pay more than $250 for an S-612; they're
not good for much more than sound effects.

Devon

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Devon M. Copley			P.O. Box 435 Yale Station
copley-devon@cs.yale.edu	New Haven, CT  06520
"The only A that matters is the one between the Y and the L."

scott@bbxsda.UUCP (Scott Amspoker) (04/16/91)

In article <30060@cs.yale.edu> copley-devon@cs.yale.edu (Devon M. Copley) writes:
>And the Mirage is 8-bit, not 12, as is (I believe) the S-612.
>
>Personally I wouldn't pay more than $250 for an S-612; they're
>not good for much more than sound effects.

The S-612 is a 6-voice, 12-bit sampler.  It is extremely limited.  It 
only holds one sample which is loaded from those awful quick-disks.
Some of the samples available for it are neverless fine samples and
you can make good use of a S-612 in a studio.  I wouldn't bother
purchasing one today though since the technology has come a ways
since then.

-- 
Scott Amspoker                       | Touch the peripheral convex of every
Basis International, Albuquerque, NM | kind, then various kinds of blaming
(505) 345-5232                       | sound can be sent forth.
unmvax.cs.unm.edu!bbx!bbxsda!scott   |    - Instructions for a little box that
                                     |      blurts out obscenities.

cwilson@yoyodyne.ncsa.uiuc.edu (Chris Wilson) (04/16/91)

In article <30060@cs.yale.edu> copley-devon@cs.yale.edu (Devon M. Copley) writes:
>Unfortunately, the Akai S-612, and the Roland S-10 both use those 
>ABYSMAL 2.8 inch "Quick Disks";  I would strongly recommend against
>buying into that awful non-standard format.  It takes FOUR of the
>little suckers just to load the S-10's tiny memory!  Almost makes

I believe it takes four SIDES to fill the S-10's memory- i.e., TWO disks.

>And the Mirage is 8-bit, not 12, as is (I believe) the S-612.

The Akai S-612 is 12-bit.

-Chris Wilson
 cwilson@uiuc.edu