[comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains] centralizing versus distributing

roode@ORC.OLIVETTI.COM (David Roode) (07/09/90)

You can't solve all the world's problems with the DNS, but it does
provide some useful tools.  I think it is possible and indeed quite common
to set up a perfectly good, functioning system for distributed rather than
central management of host names and address assignments.  It is not
automatic or inherent in the system that this happens, and the system
could use some extensions.

There is the market for a commercial product that would sit atop a DBMS
product probably, and implement a different system for distribution
of responsibility.  This product could control "centralized" servers
as Stan Barber advocates. However, the full power of a distributed
DBMS could be used to exactly specify the control over various
subdomains.  Support for dynamic address assignment to users could
be provided, with this being enabled or disabled ona network by
network basis, could be included.  How mundane and repetitious is this
task of assigning host names and addresses.  Why not have it
automated?

Perhaps it could be said that the only responsive central authority is
a codified, documented and automated one.