[comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains] bad .edu records from jackson state

emv@ox.com (Ed Vielmetti) (03/30/91)

bad ns records for .edu are goofing up our nameservers, and it looks
to be not unique to just us.

hopefully not going to stop the news from flowing though....

-- 
 Msen	Edward Vielmetti
/|---	moderator, comp.archives
	emv@msen.com


; <<>> DiG 2.0 <<>> @uunet.uu.net ns edu. 
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY , status: NOERROR, id: 10
;; flags: qr rd ra ; Ques: 1, Ans: 1, Auth: 1, Addit: 1
;; QUESTIONS: 
;;	edu, type = NS, class = IN

;; ANSWERS:
edu.	491711	NS	ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU.

;; AUTHORITY RECORDS:
EDU.	491711	NS	ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU.

;; ADDITIONAL RECORDS:
ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU.	491711	A	143.132.1.5

;; Sent 1 pkts, answer found in time: 160 msec 
;; FROM: poe.aa.ox.com to SERVER: uunet.uu.net  137.39.1.2
;; WHEN: Fri Mar 29 22:06:46 1991
;; MSG SIZE  sent: 21  rcvd: 80


; <<>> DiG 2.0 <<>> @umich.edu ns edu. 
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY , status: NOERROR, id: 10
;; flags: qr rd ra ; Ques: 1, Ans: 1, Auth: 1, Addit: 1
;; QUESTIONS: 
;;	edu, type = NS, class = IN

;; ANSWERS:
edu.	491697	NS	ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU.

;; AUTHORITY RECORDS:
edu.	491697	NS	ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU.

;; ADDITIONAL RECORDS:
ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU.	491697	A	143.132.1.5

;; Sent 1 pkts, answer found in time: 750 msec 
;; FROM: poe.aa.ox.com to SERVER: umich.edu  35.1.1.91
;; WHEN: Fri Mar 29 22:06:59 1991
;; MSG SIZE  sent: 21  rcvd: 80


; <<>> DiG 2.0 <<>> ns edu. 
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY , status: NOERROR, id: 6
;; flags: qr rd ra ; Ques: 1, Ans: 1, Auth: 1, Addit: 1
;; QUESTIONS: 
;;	edu, type = NS, class = IN

;; ANSWERS:
edu.	491687	NS	ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU.

;; AUTHORITY RECORDS:
edu.	491687	NS	ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU.

;; ADDITIONAL RECORDS:
ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU.	491687	A	143.132.1.5

;; Sent 1 pkts, answer found in time: 3 msec 
;; FROM: poe.aa.ox.com to SERVER: default -- 129.77.1.17
;; WHEN: Fri Mar 29 22:07:09 1991
;; MSG SIZE  sent: 21  rcvd: 80

rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert) (03/30/91)

In article <EMV.91Mar29232619@poe.aa.ox.com> emv@ox.com (Ed Vielmetti) writes:
>bad ns records for .edu are goofing up our nameservers, and it looks
>to be not unique to just us.
>
>; <<>> DiG 2.0 <<>> @uunet.uu.net ns edu. 
>;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY , status: NOERROR, id: 10
>;; flags: qr rd ra ; Ques: 1, Ans: 1, Auth: 1, Addit: 1
>;; QUESTIONS: 
>;;	edu, type = NS, class = IN
>
>;; ANSWERS:
>edu.	491711	NS	ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU.
>

 We had exactly the same experience with our nameserver.
 
 I was about to dump my nameserver cache to disk for examination, then kill
and restart it, but before doing so I did a second dig for edu.  And
magically the bad record had disappeared.

 Strange.

-- 
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
  Neil W. Rickert, Computer Science               <rickert@cs.niu.edu>
  Northern Illinois Univ.
  DeKalb, IL 60115                                   +1-815-753-6940

iglesias@draco.acs.uci.edu (Mike Iglesias) (03/30/91)

We're seeing them here too.  When I restarted one of our nameservers,
it got the correct info, except that NIC.NORDU.NET was added to the
list of nameservers for edu.  ns.nic.ddn.mil is passing this out - has
a new root nameserver been added or is this bogus too?


Mike Iglesias
University of California, Irvine
Internet:    iglesias@draco.acs.uci.edu
BITNET:      iglesias@uci
uucp:        ...!ucbvax!ucivax!iglesias

bygg@sunet.se (Johnny Eriksson) (03/31/91)

iglesias@draco.acs.uci.edu (Mike Iglesias) writes:

>We're seeing them here too.  When I restarted one of our nameservers,
>it got the correct info, except that NIC.NORDU.NET was added to the
>list of nameservers for edu.  ns.nic.ddn.mil is passing this out - has
>a new root nameserver been added or is this bogus too?

The information is correct, NIC.NORDU.NET is an official nameserver for
the edu. domain.

--Johnny

sob@TMC.EDU (Stan Barber) (03/31/91)

NIC.NORDU.NET is not a root name server. It is an .edu name server. 
At least, this is what the whois database at the ddn-nic is telling me.

-- 
Stan           internet: sob@bcm.tmc.edu         Director, Networking 
Olan           uucp: rutgers!bcm!sob             and Systems Support
Barber         Opinions expressed are only mine. Baylor College of Medicine

phil@eecs.nwu.edu (William LeFebvre) (04/02/91)

Is anything being done about these bogus NS records for "edu"?

As of Monday April 1(!!) 11:30 CST we are STILL seeing these bogus
records.  They are clogging up mail and generally making like rather
uncomfortable for us.

This isn't an April Fools joke, is it?   1/2 :-)

		William LeFebvre
		Computing Facilities Manager and Analyst
		Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
		Northwestern University
		<phil@eecs.nwu.edu>

syd@DSI.COM (Syd Weinstein) (04/02/91)

phil@eecs.nwu.edu (William LeFebvre) writes:
>Is anything being done about these bogus NS records for "edu"?

>As of Monday April 1(!!) 11:30 CST we are STILL seeing these bogus
>records.  They are clogging up mail and generally making like rather
>uncomfortable for us.

>This isn't an April Fools joke, is it?   1/2 :-)
I'm still seeing them, and I patched bind to tell me from where,
does this help anyone
Apr  1 21:57:13.620 named: Info: For question "nycenet.nycboe.edu", added zone 0 edu NS record for ADMIN.JSUMS.EDU from 192.35.82.2

2.82.35.192.in-addr.arpa	name = N2NGW.NYSER.NET

Is n2ngw.nyser.net the culprit or just another victem?

-- 
=====================================================================
Sydney S. Weinstein, CDP, CCP                   Elm Coordinator
Datacomp Systems, Inc.                          Voice: (215) 947-9900
syd@DSI.COM or dsinc!syd                        FAX:   (215) 938-0235

oleary@noc.sura.net (dave o'leary) (04/02/91)

In article <1991Apr2.030514.24496@DSI.COM> syd@DSI.COM writes:
>phil@eecs.nwu.edu (William LeFebvre) writes:
>>Is anything being done about these bogus NS records for "edu"?
>
>>As of Monday April 1(!!) 11:30 CST we are STILL seeing these bogus
>>records.  They are clogging up mail and generally making like rather
>>uncomfortable for us.
>

We have called the people at Jackson State and let them know about the 
problem, and we are prepared to help them fix it - however they have been 
on break last week through today and we haven't found the right person 
to talk to who can fix the problem.

We'll try again tomorrow to get things fixed there, however everyone
should recognize that once a problem like this is injected into the 
system it can sometimes last for quite a while.  (Incidentally, the
reason we are helping to deal with this is because JSU is a SURAnet
site.)

A couple of comments on the situation - first, it is not a good thing
that a site's misconfiguration can screw things up so badly.
Supporting efforts to improve bind, etc. and encouraging everyone to
run up to date software are noble activities.  Also, the documentation 
on how to set up this stuff correctly (hints on what to do and what 
*not* to do) should be more accessable (do they exist at all?).

Thanks for your support!

					dave

rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert) (04/03/91)

 At present BRL.MIL is infected with the bogus record.  As a result they
cannot resolve any addresses in EDU.  Since their MMDF mailer insists on
authenticating the sender, they also refuse to accept any mail from a
EDU. host, so we can't tell them about it.

-- 
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
  Neil W. Rickert, Computer Science               <rickert@cs.niu.edu>
  Northern Illinois Univ.
  DeKalb, IL 60115                                   +1-815-753-6940

jcurran@SH.CS.NET (John Curran) (04/03/91)

--------
From: dave o'leary <haven!sura.net!oleary@ames.arc.nasa.gov>

> A couple of comments on the situation - first, it is not a good thing
> that a site's misconfiguration can screw things up so badly.
> Supporting efforts to improve bind, etc. and encouraging everyone to
> run up to date software are noble activities. 

On the positive side, experiences like this tend to improve the 
tolerance of many bind implementations as sites quickly move to
insert logging and filtering.  In time, we can expect these ad-hoc
changes to prevent major DNS outages, right?  :-)

>  Also, the documentation on how to set up this stuff correctly 
> (hints on what to do and what *not* to do) should be more accessable 
> (do they exist at all?).

I get the impression that it depends on where you are. I know several
regionals that provide DNS training and/or setup to sites, but I don't
think that's standard on most nets.  In terms of documentation,  there are
quite a few DNS presentations around (slides with bullets), but I'm not
aware of any text writeups besides the Berkley BIND supplementry doc, 
and each vendors subsequent rewrite of it.

/John