js@dukee.egr.duke.edu (Jeffrey A. Shorey) (01/25/91)
From article <3430@nosc.NOSC.MIL>, by koziarz@halibut.nosc.mil (Walter A. Koziarz): > > [ some question about inferior, non Z-100 machine ] > > Please restrict this to 'comp.sys.zenith'; NOT 'comp.sys.zenith.z100'! This > > Btw, do any of you ibm-users have access to 768K of RAM under MS-DOS?? Didn't > think so. > > Walt K. Gee, sorry. Wouldn't want to cause too much traffic... Btw, how many 768Kers have CGA/EGA/MGA compatibility? Sorry Walt, I have two Z100's...both with 768K. - Jeff
koziarz@halibut.nosc.mil (Walter A. Koziarz) (01/26/91)
In article <1295@cameron.egr.duke.edu> js@dukee.egr.duke.edu (Jeffrey A. Shorey) writes: >From article <3430@nosc.NOSC.MIL>, by koziarz@halibut.nosc.mil (Walter A. Koziarz): >> [ scathing remarks about non-Z-100s ] > >Gee, sorry. Wouldn't want to cause too much traffic... Btw, how many 768Kers >have CGA/EGA/MGA compatibility? > A lot of them; CGA is *easy* via Pat Swayne's 'ZPC' program, 'Sextant' magazine showed how to alter ZPC to do EGA *AND* (thanks to Travis Barfield) Z-100 have the capability to show 640X480 in _512_ colors, sometime this century ibm-ish things *might* catch up. That's sufficient to show *four* standard VGA images simultaneously (remember, *real* VGA is (chuckle) 320X200 in only 256 colors). It is, however, a shame to degrade Travis's board in that manner... >Sorry Walt, I have two Z100's...both with 768K. > 'Sorry', for what? You obviously are aware of the hardware superiority of the Z-100 over the rest... Walt K. >- Jeff