[comp.unix.microport] Using SysV/AT filesystem on SysV/386

egs@killer.UUCP (Eric Schnoebelen) (05/26/88)

Hello World!
	I currently have a System V/AT system running, using a secondary
117M Disk with a file system on it, and am bringing up a System V/386 machine.
What I want to do is mount the 117M drive as a file system on the System V/386
machine and copy the file system onto another drive ( I have to return the
117M drive ).  Are there any problems with this idea?  Are the file systems
compatiable?  what about mounting readonly?  I don't really look forward to
the idea of backing everything up to floppy to do the drive change.

	Thanks In Advance
	Eric Schnoebelen
	..!killer!u-word!egs

root@uwspan.UUCP (Sue Peru Sr.) (05/26/88)

+---- egs@killer.UUCP (Eric Schnoebelen) writes in <4178@killer.UUCP> ----
| I don't really look forward to the idea of backing everything [117Mb]
| up to floppy to do the drive change.
+----

Speaking from several bad experiences (if it bites you once, its an accident,
if it bites you again, you are a fool!), WHENEVER that little voice inside
says ""I'd rather not back up this drive"" you can be 100% sure that
you will clobber the data completely.

Remember, Mr. Murphy gets his jollies by making SURE you follow each of
these phrases:

"I'm only going to update one of the unused filesystems with divvy...",
"I can use format to fix that bad sector without bothering anything"
"I can re-install drive 0 without backing up drive 1"

with the one word:

"oops" :-(

Believe me, it ***IS*** worth the bother to back it up onto hundreds of
floppies!  It is much more of a bother to type it all in again.

(At this point, tape backup salesmen start seeing $$$$ :-)

  -John (He's been there...) Plocher

-- 
Comp.Unix.Microport is now unmoderated!  Use at your own risk :-)