ken@gatech.edu (Ken Seefried iii) (08/12/88)
In article <95@jetson.UPMA.MD.US> john@jetson.UPMA.MD.US (John Owens) writes: >In article <6643@conexch.UUCP>, enped@conexch.UUCP (Eric Pederson) writes: >> We haven't had as much luck with SCO Xenix. I think our troubles may be due >> to poor SVID IPC support in the 2.1 Xenix for the 386. > >If you think this is true, then the 2.3 version will probably help. >It's based on the AT&T 386 System V version (the same one all the >386ix's are based on) merged with all the extra Xenix features, so it >should support IPC and shared memory as well as the others. > okay, great...now you can tell us WHICH release of System V it is: 0, 1, 2 or 3? Since you mention shared memory, I will assume you mean release 3, but i would like to be sure. ken seefried iii ...!{akgua, allegra, amd, harpo, hplabs, ken@gatech.edu inhp4, masscomp, rlgvax, sb1, uf-cgrl, ccastks@gitvm1.bitnet unmvax, ut-ngp, ut-sally}!gatech!ken soon to be open: ...!gatech!spooge!ken (finally ;'})