[alt.hypertext] Call for discussion: comp.multimedia

ittai@shemesh.gba.nyu.edu (Ittai Hershman) (11/26/90)

Proposal:   The creation of a newsgroup called "comp.multimedia"
	    to discuss interactive multimedia technologies and
	    applications: systems which combine text, graphic images,
	    animation, sound, and/or video, with computer technology.

	    The newsgroup would promote discussion of relevant
	    technologies (e.g. DVI, CD-I, CD ROM, videodisc)
	    applications and methodologies.

Rationale:  At present there is no newsgroup which addresses
            "multimedia" technology and applications per se.

	    There are three groups which discuss specialized
	    aspects: comp.mail.multi-media, comp.ivideodisc
	    and comp.cog-eng.  None, however, is regarded as
	    a focal point for "multimedia" and all suffer from
	    crossposts as a result.

	    "Multimedia" is a group of technologies with a lot
	    of momentum, in the same way that "AI" and "groupware"
	    have been before.  As these technologies and their
	    applications mature, traffic may dictate the formation
	    of subgroups (like: comp.multimedia.interactive,
	    comp.multimedia.desktop, comp.multimedia.dvi, etc.).
	    At the moment, however, one forum with one unified name
	    would be best in my opinion.

Naming:     Ten days ago I floated the idea for "comp.multimedia" on
	    the comp.ivideodisc newsgroup.  The reaction was positive,
	    but a number of people voiced dissatisfaction with the
	    term "multimedia".  One person typified the naming problem
	    when he stated: "The lexical token `multimedia' is pretty
	    much debased."  Alternatives such as "polymedia" and
	    "new-media" were suggested.

	    My response to these concerns is that whether we like it or
	    not the term "multimedia" has stuck to this stuff.  I
	    suggest its use in the title simply because it is the term
	    which most people associate with the topic and is therefore
	    most likely to attract those who are interested.  

	    I hope we do not spend the next month -- the alotted time
	    for discussion before a vote, arguing about neologisms.

Unless this gets bogged down in hopeless disagreement (which I hope
does not occur), I will continue the process with a "call for vote" on
December 15th.  I ask all interested parties to voice an opinion on
news.groups in response to this message (preferably positive :-) and
to vote accordingly (via e-mail) in response to the "call for vote" on
December 15th.

Ittai Hershman
Associate Director of Academic Computing
NYU Stern School of Business