faustus (02/01/83)
It seems that there is a significant need for a group of this sort, considering all the discussion that has been going on in net.misc of this nature. So in the interests of fighting entropy and such noble things, would whoever is in charge of making new groups create this one (assuming that people don't object)? Wayne Christopher faustus@berkeley ucbvax!faustus
derek (02/05/83)
What about net.debate.religion and net.debate.abortion and net.debate.everything to hold these damn debates on issues which are never resolved anyway. Topics such as the above are so much a part of individual's upbringing that no discussion will change people's views anyway. Derek Andrew U of Saskatchewan
norskog (02/08/83)
#R:sask:-20400:fortune:7700002:000:53 fortune!norskog Feb 7 16:09:00 1983 Why net.debate.religion? We already have net.flame!