tfilm (02/22/83)
RE: net.books I appreciate all the positive (no negative) responses for a 'net.books' newsgroup. About 20 people responded to my original suggestion, perhaps more, since I do not know about those who responded to Dann. One suggestion that I had at first thought sounded good was to name the group 'net.lit', for literature; however, one cirtic/respondent felt that net.lit may connote established works of literature only, and not current or newly released material. I respect that view, and add that this group may include other than literary discussions, as, for instance, illustrators' artistic style or messages from wordless books (pictures only). Several respondents preferred 'books' to 'book'; no one preferred 'book' to 'books'. I will ask our administrator to set up a 'net.books' newsgroup as soon as possible. Then, when my annual head/throat/chest infection has cleared up, I will attempt to support this brave new attempt to bring 'culture' to the newswaves. MEL ihuxp!tfilm