PMT@dlgm.daresbury.ac.uk (Postmaster) (01/20/89)
To: BIONEWS
From: DARESBURY SEQMAIL <SEQ@UK.AC.DARESBURY.DLGM>
Reply-to: MJB1@UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 89 17:09 GMT
Subject: BIONET-20 is down
Message-Id: <19 JAN 1989 17:09:30 SEQ@UK.AC.DARESBURY.DLGM>
---- Start of forwarded message.
Via: UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX; Fri, 6 Jan 89 15:50 GMT
(V40 at UK.AC.DARESBURY.DLGM)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 89 17:09 GMT
From: MJB1@UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX
To: biosci@UK.AC.DARESBURY
Subject: BIONET-20 is down
Message-ID: <9FADB17DF7190C00@UK.AC.CAM.PHX>
(Message number 8)
Accepted: 15:43:30 06 Jan 89
Submitted: 09:59:14 06 Jan 89
IPMessageId: -unspecified-
From: SMTP@EDU.CUNY.CUNYVM
To: MJB1@UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX
Subject: Undeliverable Mail
Received: from UKACRL by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id 8444; Fri, 06
Jan 89 15:01:31 GM
Received: from CUNYVM.BITNET by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id
7139; Fri, 06 Jan 89 15:01:30 G
Received: from CUNYVM by CUNYVM.BITNET (Mailer R2.01) with BSMTP id 8107; Fri,
06 Jan 89 09:59:16 E
CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU unable to deliver following mail to recipient(s):
<Incoming-molecular-evolution@BIONET-20.BIO.NET>
CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU unable to connect for 3 days to host:
BIONET-20.BIO.NET
** Text of Mail follows **
Received: from UKACRL.BITNET by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP R1.1) with BSMTP
id
8473; Tue, 03 Jan 89 09:54:23 EST
Received: from RL.IB by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id 0352; Tue,
03 Jan 89 14:44:28 GMT
Received:
Via: UK.AC.DL.DLGM; 3 JAN 89 14:44:22 GMT
Via: UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX; Tue, 3 Jan 89 14:35 GMT
(V40 at UK.AC.DARESBURY.DLGM
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 89 17:09 GMT
From: MJB1%PHOENIX.CAMBRIDGE.AC.UK@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
To: mol-evol@DARESBURY.AC.UK
Subject: Genetic algorithms.
Message-ID: <9FA9D0E821139E70@UK.AC.CAM.PHX>
There has been some recent discussion of these.
However, I am not familiar with the work which is being described.
Could someone give a list of the relevant references.
Than you. Martin Bishop.
---- End of forwarded message.