PMT@dlgm.daresbury.ac.uk (Postmaster) (01/20/89)
To: BIONEWS From: DARESBURY SEQMAIL <SEQ@UK.AC.DARESBURY.DLGM> Reply-to: MJB1@UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX Date: Thu, 19 Jan 89 17:09 GMT Subject: BIONET-20 is down Message-Id: <19 JAN 1989 17:09:30 SEQ@UK.AC.DARESBURY.DLGM> ---- Start of forwarded message. Via: UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX; Fri, 6 Jan 89 15:50 GMT (V40 at UK.AC.DARESBURY.DLGM) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 89 17:09 GMT From: MJB1@UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX To: biosci@UK.AC.DARESBURY Subject: BIONET-20 is down Message-ID: <9FADB17DF7190C00@UK.AC.CAM.PHX> (Message number 8) Accepted: 15:43:30 06 Jan 89 Submitted: 09:59:14 06 Jan 89 IPMessageId: -unspecified- From: SMTP@EDU.CUNY.CUNYVM To: MJB1@UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX Subject: Undeliverable Mail Received: from UKACRL by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id 8444; Fri, 06 Jan 89 15:01:31 GM Received: from CUNYVM.BITNET by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id 7139; Fri, 06 Jan 89 15:01:30 G Received: from CUNYVM by CUNYVM.BITNET (Mailer R2.01) with BSMTP id 8107; Fri, 06 Jan 89 09:59:16 E CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU unable to deliver following mail to recipient(s): <Incoming-molecular-evolution@BIONET-20.BIO.NET> CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU unable to connect for 3 days to host: BIONET-20.BIO.NET ** Text of Mail follows ** Received: from UKACRL.BITNET by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP R1.1) with BSMTP id 8473; Tue, 03 Jan 89 09:54:23 EST Received: from RL.IB by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id 0352; Tue, 03 Jan 89 14:44:28 GMT Received: Via: UK.AC.DL.DLGM; 3 JAN 89 14:44:22 GMT Via: UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX; Tue, 3 Jan 89 14:35 GMT (V40 at UK.AC.DARESBURY.DLGM Date: Thu, 19 Jan 89 17:09 GMT From: MJB1%PHOENIX.CAMBRIDGE.AC.UK@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU To: mol-evol@DARESBURY.AC.UK Subject: Genetic algorithms. Message-ID: <9FA9D0E821139E70@UK.AC.CAM.PHX> There has been some recent discussion of these. However, I am not familiar with the work which is being described. Could someone give a list of the relevant references. Than you. Martin Bishop. ---- End of forwarded message.