[bionet.general] Proposal for Human Chromosome 22 Electronic Newsgroup

kristoff@GENBANK.BIO.NET (Dave Kristofferson) (10/23/90)

I have received the following proposal to form an electronic bulletin
board for the chromosome 22 community.  Under BIOSCI regulations,
proposals are put to a vote of our readership (as described below) and
at least 40 "yes" votes must be obtained within 60 days before the
group can be established.  Voting is now open and the voting addresses
are given below.  Votes must be received by 21 December 1990.

				Sincerely,

				Dave Kristofferson
				GenBank Manager

				kristoff@genbank.bio.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------

     This is the first electronic announcement of intent to establish an 
electronic bulletin board on the topic of Human Chromosome 22.  The 
bulletin board will be accessible to all persons that use electronic mail 
-i.e. an international group.  Although the exact nature of the bulletin 
board will evolve with use, its primary purpose will be to allow more 
frequent contact among persons interested in items related to chromosome 
22.  This includes persons interested in the human genome program of 
mapping and sequencing chromosome 22, as well as persons interested in 
specific genes, chromosomal abnormalities and disease phenotypes related to 
22.  It can be a forum to distribute information concerning new clones, 
references, cell lines, genes, polymorphisms, and scientific meetings 
related to chromosome 22.
     The proposed electronic bulletin board will be part of the 
international BIOSCI bulletin board network.  To become a reality, forty 
different people with distinct e-mail addresses must reply to this 
announcement within two months.  These responses must be sent to one 
of the "biovote" addresses below (depending upon your location/network).

ADDRESS                   LOCATION                NETWORK

biovote@irlearn.ucd.ie    Ireland                 EARN/BITNET

biovote@uk.ac.daresbury   United Kingdom          JANET

biovote@bmc.uu.se         Sweden                  Internet

biovote@genbank.bio.net   U.S.A.                  Internet/BITNET

[NOTE: Users in other parts of the world should contact either the
BIOSCI node in Ireland or the U.S.A. depending upon which one they can
access easily.]

Please forward this notification to all persons in your group or 
institution that may be interested in participating, but may fail
to see this electronic announcement.  The following persons may also be 
notified if you have questions or suggestions concerning the bulletin 
board:

Beverly S. Emanuel, Ph.D.                Robert L. Nussbaum, M.D.
Chairman Chromosome 22, HGM11            Nussbaum@A1.MSCF.UPENN.EDU
EMANUEL@A1.MSCF.UPENN.EDU

Nat L. Sternberg, Ph.D.                  Nancy S. Shepherd, Ph.D.
STERNBER@ESVAX.DUPONT.COM                SHEPHERD@ESVAX.DUPONT.COM

Thank you in advance for your interest.

usenet@nlm.nih.gov (usenet news poster) (10/26/90)

In article <CMM.0.88.656637413.kristoff@genbank.bio.net> biovote@genbank.bio.net writes:
>I have received the following proposal to form an electronic bulletin
>board for the chromosome 22 community.  Under BIOSCI regulations,
>proposals are put to a vote of our readership (as described below) and
>at least 40 "yes" votes must be obtained within 60 days before the
>group can be established.  Voting is now open and the voting addresses
>are given below.  Votes must be received by 21 December 1990.

I am in favor of creating such a newgroup, but it should be pointed out
that the guidelines for creating a USENET newgroup are more stringent than
stated above.  First, there is to be a 30 day discussion period , then
a call for votes.  The votes must be scored as follows:

3) AFTER the waiting period, and if there were no serious objections that might   invalidate the vote, and if 100 more valid YES/create votes are received
   than NO/don't create AND at least 2/3 of the total number of valid votes
   received are in favor of creation, a newgroup control message may be sent
   out.  If the 100 vote margin or 2/3 percentage is not met, the group should
   not be created.

See news.announce.newusers for a complete discussion of this.  BIONET is part
of USENET and clearly benefits from USENET resources.  We should abide by
USENET guidelines.

David
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are my own; your vote determines the 
opinions and policy of the United States government.

David J. States            National Center for Biotechnology Information
states@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov                     National Library of Medicine

kristoff@genbank.bio.net (David Kristofferson) (10/27/90)

David,

	Thanks for your vote to form the newsgroup.  I expect at the
rate votes are coming in the group will be approved soon.

	Regarding voting procedures, Eliot Lear who manages the bionet
USENET groups here, and who has considerable experience working with
netnews software, happens to be (not coincidentally 8-) the moderator
of news.announce.newgroups, the main USENET newsgroup in which calls
for new groups are put out.  He is intimately familiar with USENET
regulations.  The rules that you cite are for the major USENET domains
such as comp, rec, sci, etc.  The bionet groups are not required to
adhere to those guidelines since they are a small specialty set.  Our
current regulations were worked out by common agreement among the
BIOSCI/bionet managers at our various distribution nodes.  Biologists
are not yet present on the net in numbers comparable to computer
scientists, and to hold them to rules set up by computer scientists
would effectively prevent the formation of almost any newsgroup at
this stage of development.
-- 
				Sincerely,

				Dave Kristofferson
				GenBank Manager

				kristoff@genbank.bio.net