[comp.sys.tahoe] want sar guidelines on CCI 6/32 with 8 or 16 megs

jay@hqda-ai.ARPA (Jay Hiser) (07/29/88)

I'm responsible for 3 (soon to be 6) Tahoes, CCI's own Power 6/32
running CCI's SysVR2.22 and OFFICE POWER software.  Presently they
have 8 megs & 1 processor.  Plans are to increase memory to 16M.  All
systems have 1 controller & two drives.  One test machine (lucky one!)
will have an additional drive & controller.

I'm interested in some guidelines on what numbers I should be looking
at when using the sar utility.  Inode tables look good.  Hit ratio on
reads is 95%+, but on writes it hovers below 80%.  sar -u often shows
%wio over 20%.  I suspect that increasing the size of my disk caches
will improve performance (although performance is already more than
acceptable).  

I'd appreciate comments & any official guidelines.  Thank you,

Jay Heiser
..uunet!daitc!otishq!TONS61!jayh

muller@sdcc7.ucsd.EDU (Keith Muller) (07/30/88)

One other thing you might try is the 4.3BSD-tahoe release. MUSH benchmarks
on system V and 4.3BSD-tahoe is quite favorable towards 4.3bsd-tahoe
by a significant amount. Clearly some of this is due to a much better
compiler on 4.3BSD (thanks Donn Seeley!), but general kernel overhead is a lot
less also. tcp/ip on 4.3BSD-tahoe has van jacobsons performance mods.

	Keith Muller
	University of California