george (04/30/83)
Upon thinking about the fate of "net.general", an idea for "net.misc" occurred to me. Some new groups, "net.misc.a", "net.misc.b", "net.misc.c", could be created as arbitrary sub-groups to provide more structure in grouping discussions that should be in "net.misc". When someone posts an article on a new topic for net.misc, they could choose a sub-group that seems to be least crowded. Of course follow up articles would stay in the same sub-group. George Rosenberg idis!george