[comp.sys.sgi] TeX 3.0 is busted, get 3.1

Dan Karron@UCBVAX.BERKELEY.EDU (06/04/91)

Get 3.1. 
It works. 3.0 is badly busted. I had the same problem.

I had a little tweaking to do. If you want my installation,
I will send it to you. 

I made a courtsey donation to the U of Washington
instead of the distribution fee when I get my copy from colleague.

Has anyone got a working PixTeX for sgi ?

>
>Has anyone successfully built TeX 3.0 on an 4D/25?  I tried building it and
>it compiled o.k. (after two tries), but when I tried to run latex on the
>sample document sample.tex, it generated one word per page. 
>
>I have had no problems using TeX 2.93.
>
>As a side comment, I have been using dvix as a TeX previewer for a while 
>now, and have had found it completely satisfactory.  Note, dvix is
>distinct from xdvi, which I have never been able to get working right
>on this platform.
>-- 
>Steven H. Izen, Associate Professor, Dept. of Math. and Stat.
>Reply to shi@po.cwru.edu or steve@izen386.math.cwru.edu or
>steve@pitacat.lerc.nasa.gov or uunet!cwjcc!skybridge!izen386!steve
>Entropy - It's not what it used to be. 
>
| karron@nyu.edu (e-mail alias )         Dan Karron, Research Associate      |
| Phone: 212 263 5210 Fax: 212 263 7190  New York University Medical Center  |
| 560 First Avenue                       Digital Pager <1> (212) 397 9330    |
| New York, New York 10016               <2> 10896   <3> <your-number-here>  |

rosalia@max.physics.sunysb.edu (Mark Galassi) (06/10/91)

In article <luis.644517375@keckiris> luis@rice.edu (luis soltero) writes:
>TeX 3.0 compiled and ran fine on a 4D/310 under IRIX 3.3.1
>using gcc.

>>Get 3.1. 
>>It works. 3.0 is badly busted. I had the same problem.

>>>Has anyone successfully built TeX 3.0 on an 4D/25?  I tried building it and
>>>it compiled o.k. (after two tries), but when I tried to run latex on the
>>>sample document sample.tex, it generated one word per page. 

If you look at the "site.h" file in the UNIX TeX3.0 distribution which
is right now on Labrea, you will see that there is a place where you
must #define or typedef "schar" to get signed chars.  The MIPS C
compiler will (ordinarily) keep chars unsigned.  I kept on getting one
word/page until I changed that.  After I changed it, it worked fine.

Also:  what's all this about 3.1?  I checked labrea.stanford.edu
(or whatever) and didn't see it a couple of weeks ago.

-- 
    {These opinions are mine, and should be everybody else's :-)}
	Mark Galassi		rosalia@dirac.physics.sunysb.edu
				rosalia@sunysbnp.BITNET