root@fuzzy (Dr. Michael M. Cohen) (06/11/91)
ls -lt seems to be confused about what's latest!
<<d 12>>ls -lt
total 66
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 286 Apr 12 1991 lpd*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 433 Feb 21 1991 perf*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 560 Feb 21 1991 acct*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 490 Feb 21 1991 configmsg*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 1229 Feb 21 1991 cron*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 398 Feb 21 1991 lp*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 2539 Feb 21 1991 mail*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 18047 Feb 21 1991 network*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 1125 Feb 21 1991 RMTMPFILES*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 166 Feb 21 1991 savecore*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 684 Feb 21 1991 autoconfig*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 819 Feb 21 1991 sysetup*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 424 Feb 21 1991 uucp*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 1903 Feb 21 1991 README*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 279 Feb 21 1991 MOUNTFSYS*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 45 Jun 6 22:11 network.local.x*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 87 Jun 6 22:11 network.local*
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2nd bug is that network.local does not work correctly on boot
I get message:/usr/etc/route add default 128.114.133.251 1: file exists
(something pretty close to that anyhow), and remote cites are not known.
I can manually say "network.local" which will properly add the route.
network.local contains:
if test $1 = stop ; then
exit;
fi
/usr/etc/route add default 128.114.133.251 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------
the proper links are put in rc0.d and rc2.d as outlined
in /etc/init.d/network
Can anyone explain why this fails?
TIA, MM Cohenjeremy@perf2.asd.sgi.com (Jeremy Higdon) (06/11/91)
In article <16903@darkstar.ucsc.edu>, root@fuzzy (Dr. Michael M. Cohen) writes: > ls -lt seems to be confused about what's latest! > > <<d 12>>ls -lt > total 66 > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 286 Apr 12 1991 lpd* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 433 Feb 21 1991 perf* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 560 Feb 21 1991 acct* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 490 Feb 21 1991 configmsg* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 1229 Feb 21 1991 cron* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 398 Feb 21 1991 lp* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 2539 Feb 21 1991 mail* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 18047 Feb 21 1991 network* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 1125 Feb 21 1991 RMTMPFILES* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 166 Feb 21 1991 savecore* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 684 Feb 21 1991 autoconfig* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 819 Feb 21 1991 sysetup* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 424 Feb 21 1991 uucp* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 1903 Feb 21 1991 README* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 279 Feb 21 1991 MOUNTFSYS* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 45 Jun 6 22:11 network.local.x* > -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 87 Jun 6 22:11 network.local* My guess is that your system date is wrong. Otherwise, ls would not print the year for the other listed files.
olson@anchor.esd.sgi.com (Dave Olson) (06/11/91)
In <16903@darkstar.ucsc.edu> root@fuzzy (Dr. Michael M. Cohen) writes: | ls -lt seems to be confused about what's latest! | | <<d 12>>ls -lt | total 66 | -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 286 Apr 12 1991 lpd* | -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 433 Feb 21 1991 perf* | -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 1903 Feb 21 1991 README* | -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 279 Feb 21 1991 MOUNTFSYS* | -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 45 Jun 6 22:11 network.local.x* | -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 87 Jun 6 22:11 network.local* The Jun 6 files are almost certainly dated in 1990, or earlier. For the 1991 to be be printing on the others, I'd guess that your system date has somehow been set to be in 1990, or even earlier. I can't help on the other problem, perhaps one of the network folks can shed some light. -- Dave Olson Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code.
root@fuzzy (Dr. Michael M. Cohen) (06/11/91)
In article <109550@sgi.sgi.com> jeremy@perf2.asd.sgi.com (Jeremy Higdon) writes: >In article <16903@darkstar.ucsc.edu>, root@fuzzy (Dr. Michael M. Cohen) writes: >> ls -lt seems to be confused about what's latest! >> >> <<d 12>>ls -lt >> total 66 >> -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 286 Apr 12 1991 lpd* ... >> -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 45 Jun 6 22:11 network.local.x* >> -rwxr--r-- 1 root sys 87 Jun 6 22:11 network.local* > >My guess is that your system date is wrong. Otherwise, ls would not >print the year for the other listed files. you're right the clock was off by a year! MMC filler filler filler filler filler filler filler