ark@rabbit.UUCP (07/27/83)
Doesn't make sense to me.
dave@utcsrgv.UUCP (Dave Sherman) (07/28/83)
rabbit!ark asks why net.chess but not net.rec.bridge.... net.chess is used for aspects of chess other than the recreational, as well as the recreational. E.g., discussions of computer chess, discussions of the current state of the world championship (closer to net.sport than net.rec), and so on. Dave Sherman, Toronto utcsrgv!dave
rh@mit-eddie.UUCP (Randy Haskins) (07/29/83)
I suppose it doesn't matter much, although once I losingly tried to post something to net.bridge (didn't work). I guess the big thing in life is to reduce the number of dots (after all, I was thrilled when I went from UC.RGH to RH on our twenex.) The more dots something has, the lower the Karma? -- Randwulf (Randy Haskins) genrad!mit-eddie!rh or... rh@mit-ee (via mit-mc)