CLS016@vaxc.bangor.ac.uk ("Edmund J. Sutcliffe ") (01/12/91)
Has anyone out there had any experience with Sun's PC-NFS and placing it in High memory, with such products as 386Max and The Last Byte. I would be grateful for all help given in this field, Thanks Edmund
rjf@gdwb.oz.au (Rex Foord) (01/13/91)
CLS016@vaxc.bangor.ac.uk ("Edmund J. Sutcliffe ") writes: >Has anyone out there had any experience with Sun's PC-NFS and placing it >in High memory, with such products as 386Max and The Last Byte. > I would be grateful for all help given in this field, Thanks > Edmund We use 386max to place PCNFS.SYS and SOCKDRV.SYS into high mem. Works fine. Depending on the type of ethernet card and the drivers these too may be placed into high mem. Rex Foord PC Support Programmer Geelong & District Water Board, Australia rjf@gdwb.oz.au
link@dtoa3.dt.navy.mil (Link) (01/15/91)
In article <9101120853.aa12652@louie.udel.edu> CLS016@vaxc.bangor.ac.uk ("Edmund J. Sutcliffe ") writes: >Has anyone out there had any experience with Sun's PC-NFS and placing it >in High memory, with such products as 386Max and The Last Byte. > I would be grateful for all help given in this field, Thanks > Edmund I haven't tried using 386Max or The Last Byte, but I have used QEMM 5.0 to load several pieces of PC-NFS into high memory. I have had success loading ANSI.SYS, PCNFS.SYS, VECIE6.SYS (3C503 driver) and PRT.COM. You can't load SOCKDRV.SYS high with QEMM. It seems to work fine and saves a good bit space. If only I could fix my problem with telnet under DESQview. More on that in another posting. RICK