[net.micro] Does anyone have the dope on Zilog's Z800?

maxwell@orphan.DEC (04/19/85)

[Sorry, about the incomplete version. ^C is too easy to type, sometimes....]

For  the  last  couple  of  years,  I've  been  drooling  over  what  little
information  I've  been able to accumulate about Zilog's Z80 descendant, the
Z800.  The  thought  of  a Z80 with real addressing modes, 16-bit operations
including  multiply  and  divide, system and user modes, and built in memory
management,  really  makes this old Z80 programmer believe in a Santa Claus.
All this and Z80 object compatability, too. Wow!

So,  with  a  large  archive  of  Z80  code,  and several Z80 based machines
gathering dust in my home, I have decided to build a Z800 machine to replace
them.  This  will  allow me to continue using much of my older Z80 code, but
eventually  allow  for  a  more  robust  operating  system and tools, once I
complete  modification  of  a  C  compiler  to  take  advantange of the Z800
enhancements.

The problem is, Santa Claus is late, and isn't talking.

Zilog has been promising the Z800 (and Z80000) for some time now. Last year,
"The  Z800  and Z80000 will be available in February, 1985". This year, "The
Z800 won't be available until 1986".

Additionally,  pitifully  little  useful  documentation  is  available.  For
example, though I know what the new instructions and addressing modes are by
name,  it's  rather  hard  to  write  a Z800 assembler if the opcode/operand
formats  and  values  aren't  published.  It's  also hard to begin designing
hardware when chip timing diagrams are just pretty pictures without specific
timing data.

Does  anyone out there know what's going on? Does anyone have opcode/operand
listings?  Does  anyone  have timing diagrams with numbers on them? Is Zilog
really  going  to ship this processor, or will it always be coming out "next
year"?

Please  respond  to  me  directly. Useful information will be summarized and
published  in  this  august  journal,  if there is interest, and if there is
anything concrete to report.

-+- Sid Maxwell

[The  standard  disclaimer  should  go here, but I'm not sure that any of my
opinions   are  interesting  or  important  enough  for  *anyone*  to  worry
about....]