ralph@world.std.com (Ralph Lombreglia) (03/10/91)
Just a word about the "Rinaldoids" XWindows package just appearing now in .binaries. I uploaded it, but it takes a while for things to show up in that conference. Since I sent it, the "Textoid" external (1.8 in that package) has seen *two* releases, and is now up to version 2.1. I think the way one invokes it has remained stable, and so anything you do with 1.8 will likely work with later versions--if you just want to get going with it. But 2.1 does offer a bunch of new features and corrects a bug or two. I think the other two externals (Tabloid 1.0 and Listoid 1.4) are still latest versions. Ralph Lombreglia Internet: ralph@world.std.com MCI Mail: rlombreglia Bix: rlombreglia
ireland@ac.dal.ca (03/11/91)
In article <1991Mar10.150143.21491@world.std.com>, ralph@world.std.com (Ralph Lombreglia) writes: > Just a word about the "Rinaldoids" XWindows package just appearing now > in .binaries. I uploaded it, but it takes a while for things to show > up in that conference. Since I sent it, the "Textoid" external (1.8 > in that package) has seen *two* releases, and is now up to version > 2.1. I think the way one invokes it has remained stable, and so > anything you do with 1.8 will likely work with later versions--if you > just want to get going with it. But 2.1 does offer a bunch of new > features and corrects a bug or two. I think the other two externals > (Tabloid 1.0 and Listoid 1.4) are still latest versions. > > Ralph Lombreglia > Internet: ralph@world.std.com MCI Mail: rlombreglia Bix: rlombreglia Frederic Renaldi has been busy. I downloaded Tabloid 1.1 and Listoid 1.6 off Compuserve last week. I haven't had much chance to play with these externals yet, so I don't know how they're different than previous versions, but I do use Textoid in one of my stacks and agree that version 2.1 is significantly better than version 1.8 . Keith Conover ireland@ac.dal.ca
mxmora@unix.SRI.COM (Matt Mora) (03/12/91)
In article <1991Mar10.150143.21491@world.std.com> ralph@world.std.com (Ralph Lombreglia) writes: >in that package) has seen *two* releases, and is now up to version >2.1. I think the way one invokes it has remained stable, and so >anything you do with 1.8 will likely work with later versions--if you >just want to get going with it. But 2.1 does offer a bunch of new >features and corrects a bug or two. I think the other two externals Does anybody have this new version and can you send it to me? Thanks Matt -- ___________________________________________________________ Matthew Mora | my Mac Matt_Mora@sri.com SRI International | my unix mxmora@unix.sri.com ___________________________________________________________