richman@UXE.CSO.UIUC.EDU (Mike Richman) (01/09/89)
From richman@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu Sun Jan 8 20:53:05 1989 Received: by uxe.cso.uiuc.edu (5.60/IDA-1.2.5) id AA24787; Sun, 8 Jan 89 20:53:05 CST Date: Sun, 8 Jan 89 20:53:05 CST From: Mike Richman <richman@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> Message-Id: <8901090253.AA24787@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> To: info-futurea@multimax.encore.com Subject: Please unsubscribe me from this list I've tried info-futures-request with no success, so as a last ditch effort (and waste of disk space - this note that is) PLEASE remove me from this list. Thanks.
bzs@pinocchio.encore.com (Barry Shein) (01/10/89)
Now here's an excellent example of the sort of assholes I have to put up with... He sends an exasperated, frustrated message to the whole list on Sunday January 8th. HIS FIRST REQUEST TO BE REMOVED WAS FRIDAY JANUARY 6TH. Two days, and over a weekend and he's ready to bother everyone on the list! I rest my case, between this sort of thing and jeff daiell's illiterate, irrelevant (yes jeff, this is a technical list about computing) babbling it makes me consider throwing the whole damn towel in. It's not a mailing list system anymore, it's more like offensive subway train graffitti. -Barry Shein >>From richman@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu Sun Jan 8 20:53:05 1989 >Received: by uxe.cso.uiuc.edu > (5.60/IDA-1.2.5) id AA24787; Sun, 8 Jan 89 20:53:05 CST >Date: Sun, 8 Jan 89 20:53:05 CST >From: Mike Richman <richman@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> >Message-Id: <8901090253.AA24787@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> >To: info-futurea@multimax.encore.com >Subject: Please unsubscribe me from this list > >I've tried info-futures-request with no success, so as a last ditch >effort (and waste of disk space - this note that is) PLEASE remove >me from this list. Thanks. -------------------- >Return-Path: <richman@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> >Date: Fri, 6 Jan 89 09:51:10 CST >From: Mike Richman <richman@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> >To: info-futures-request@encore.com > >UNSUB info-futures
jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) (01/10/89)
In article <8901091711.AA03251@pinocchio.UUCP>, bzs@pinocchio.encore.com (Barry Shein) writes: > > > jeff daiell's > illiterate, irrelevant (yes jeff, this is a technical list about > computing) babbling Hi, BS. As for illiteracy, well, I'll let others on this net comment about our relative skills with the language! (For one thing, in the English language, proper names are capitalized!) As for irrelevant, again (sorry, Elise, but some folks don't catch on at first), who controls a computer network will likely make a VERY relevant difference in how it's operated, which interests it will serve, etc. Also, you may have missed my attempts to get back to that subject, as distinguished from discussions on voting systems. But I think it's only natural that tangents will be pursued. A recent discussion in tx.general started out with an announcement on a memorial rally for Harvey Milk, and has ended up with discussions on conscription, etc. While anything can get out of hand, you should realize that some digression is inevitable. it makes me consider throwing the whole damn towel > in. Actually, the proper word is "damned". Thanks for your input. Jeff Daiell (opinions my own, until taxed away) INDEPENDENCE FOR TEXAS! -- "I'm just a soul whose intentions are good... O Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood." --- The Animals