[comp.society.futures] How about speaking the characters....?

bowles@MICA.BERKELEY.EDU (Jeff A. Bowles) (01/24/89)

Someone proposes making devices that recognize, no, not spoken words,
but spelled-out words.

"It takes me how long to say this?"	- spoke at just under 3 seconds
Same, each letter spoken		- takes just under 8 seconds
"It takes me how long to say this?"	- typed in just over 5 seconds

I wasn't intentionally trying to stack the deck, and probably a better
test is involves someone else using a clock (or a decent recorder).

But I speak faster than I pronounce each letter of the corresponding words,
because there are less syllables to just say the word. It's the Dennis
Ritchie school of abbreviation: "why use 'ref' when '*' will do?"

------------
And for me, there's an awful lot better way to say "middle-C as sounded
by a piano" than to type it or to speak it or to spell it - I'd say that
the best way is to walk up to a piano, find the key, and hit it.

Some might say that a piano keyboard is just an input device that furnishes
many abbreviations for what's really happening. They're right, even if the
keyboard generates a few MIDI sequences instead of causing air molecules to
vibrate.

------------

And before I get off my soapbox, I will point out that the mouse with the
various forms of, what's the buzzword, pull-down menus, is nothing more than
an input device that furnishes abbreviations for what's really happening,
and even surrenders to the programmer what abbreviations are available.

	Jeff Bowles