[comp.society.futures] Software Patents Talk...

bzs@pinocchio.encore.com (Barry Shein) (01/29/89)

This was forwarded to me by Brian Kahin and it looks worthwhile for
those of you able to attend.

	-Barry Shein, ||Encore||

--------------------fold and cut here--------------------

MIT Communications Forum  3/23/89

Software Patents:  A Horrible Mistake?

2:00 - 4:00  Legal Background and Industry Trends
4:00 - 6:00  Impact and Policy Issues

Bartos Theater for the Moving Image
The Wiesner Building 
(Bldg. E-15, Lower Level)
20 Ames St.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts

Daniel S. Bricklin, President, Software Garden, Inc.
Lindsey Kiang, Senior Counsel, Digital Equipment Corporation
Robert Merges, Professor of Law, Boston University
Stephen D. Kahn, Weil, Gotshal & Manges
Pamela Samuelson, Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh
R. Duff Thompson, General Counsel, WordPerfect Corporation

Patent protection is increasingly sought for new computer 
algorithms, metaphors, software systems, and methods of user 
interaction.   Patents can protect abstractions -- such as the 
basic operations of a spreadsheet -- that cannot be protected by 
copyright.  Patent protection also functions as an absolute 
monopoly which, unlike copyright, does not allow for independent 
creation.  Developers and investors proceed at the risk that 
their creation will infringe a patent application that is 
granted, pending, or yet unfiled.  In the prolific microcomputer 
software industry, this growing patent activity raises fears 
of costly and inconclusive patent searches, extortionate demands, 
and patent litigation -- "the sport of kings."

The first session will review the evolution of the law (including 
the relationship to "look and feel" issues in copyright), the 
growth and current scope of patent activity, and the reaction 
within the software industry.  The second session will consider 
the long-term impact of software patents on creativity and 
investment, lessons from other industries, and the policy 
implications of protecting ideas and abstractions through 
patents.

For further information call 617-253-3144.

jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) (01/29/89)

     The conventional wisdom is that software patents are either impossible
to get or useless.  The conventional wisdom is wrong.  I hold U.S. Patent
#4,740,904, and it has been very valuable to me.

     It's a shame that the talk is on the other coast.


					John Nagle