[comp.ai.neural-nets] colloquia

loui@wucs1.wustl.edu (Ron Loui) (11/05/88)

			COMPUTER SCIENCE COLLOQUIUM
			
			   Washington University
			         St. Louis

			      4 November 1988


  TITLE: Why AI needs Connectionism? A Representation and Reasoning Perspective


			      Lokendra Shastri
		 Computer and Information Science Department
			   University of Pennsylvania



Any generalized notion of inference is intractable, yet we are capable of
drawing a variety of inferences with remarkable efficiency - often in a few
hundered milliseconds. These inferences are by no means trivial and support a
broad range of cognitive activity such as classifying and recognizing objects,
understanding spoken and written language, and performing commonsense
reasoning.  Any serious  attempt at understanding intelligence must provide a
detailed computational account of how such inferences may be drawn with
requisite efficiency.  In this talk we describe some  work within the
connectionist framework that attempts to offer such an account. We focus on
two connectionist knowledge representation and reasoning systems:

1) A connectionist semantic memory that computes optimal solutions to an
interesting class of inheritance and recognition  problems  extremely
fast - in time proportional to the depth of the conceptual hierarchy.  In
addition to being efficient, the connectionist realization is based on an
evidential formulation and provides a principled treatment of exceptions,
conflicting multiple inheritance, as well as the best-match or
partial-match computation.

2)  A connectionist system that represents knowledge in terms of multi-place
relations (n-ary predicates), and draws a limited class of inferences based on
this knowledge with extreme efficiency. The time taken by the system to draw
conclusions is proportional to the length of the proof, and hence,
optimal.  The system incorporates a solution to the "variable binding" problem
and uses the temporal  dimension to establish and maintain bindings.

We conclude that working within the connectionist framework is well motivated
as it helps in identifying interesting classes of limited inference that can
be performed with extreme efficiently, and aids in discovering constraints
that must be placed on the conceptual structure in order to achieve extreme
efficiency.


host:  Ronald Loui
________________________________________________________________________________

	1988-89 AI Colloquium Series (through February)


Sep	16	Michael Wellman, MIT/Air Force
			"The Trade-off Formulation Task in Planning under Uncertainty"
	30	Kathryn Laskey, Decision Science Consortium
			"Assumptions, Beliefs, and Probabilities"
Nov	4	Lokendra Shastri, University of Pennsylvania
			"Why AI Needs Connectionism?  A Representation and Reasoning
			Perspective"
	11	Peter Jackson, McDonnell Douglas Research Laboratories
			"Diagnosis, Defaults, and Abduction"
	18      Eric Horvitz, Stanford University (decision-theoretic control
			of problem-solving) 
Dec     2       Mark Drummond, NASA Ames (planning)
Feb 	3       Fahiem Bacchus, University of Waterloo (uncertain reasoning)
	10      Dana Nau, University of Maryland (TBA)

		other speakers to be announced

________________________________________________________________________________