[comp.ai.neural-nets] social connectionism ?

mcyang@pollux.usc.edu (Mitch Yang) (07/16/89)

    Is there any people developing some kind of social connectionism which 
might be used to explain some social phenomena just like social Darwinism ?
===============================================================================
Mitch Yang  			  	InterNet: mcyang@pollux.usc.edu
Department of Electrical Engineering	CSnet:    mcyang@usc-cse.csnet
University of Southern California 	Bitnet:   mcyang%pollux@kylara.bitnet
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0781	  	UUCP:     oberon!pollux.usc.edu!mcyang

andrew@berlioz (Lord Snooty @ The Giant Poisoned Electric Head ) (07/18/89)

In article <18550@usc.edu>, mcyang@pollux.usc.edu (Mitch Yang) writes:
>     Is there any people developing some kind of social connectionism which 
> might be used to explain some social phenomena just like social Darwinism ?

Or indeed, the whole gamut of economic activity?! (In this regard, small
attempts are indeed being made by Wall Street right now, but this is just
a nibble out of the enormous slice which you have carved out here!).
-- 
...................................................................
Andrew Palfreyman	I should have been a pair of ragged claws
nsc!berlioz!andrew	Scuttling across the floors of silent seas
...................................................................

wlp@calmasd.Prime.COM (Walter Peterson) (07/20/89)

In article <18550@usc.edu>, mcyang@pollux.usc.edu (Mitch Yang) writes:
> 
>     Is there any people developing some kind of social connectionism which 
> might be used to explain some social phenomena just like social Darwinism ?
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ===============================================================================


I had no problems with this posting until I saw the last four words;
"...just like Social Darwinism".  The 'philosophy' of Social Darwinism
comes from the last part of the 19th and early 20th centuries and is
as much of a distortion of the theory of evolution by natural
selection as some of the non-sense spouted by the creationists.
Social Darwinism took a distorted view of the concept of
'survival-of-the-fittest' to attempt to support a world-view that went
beyond racism in its arrogance and elitism.  It transcended racism in
that people who espoused this view applied it not only to the
non-white races, but also to the so-called "lower classes" of their
fellow whites, even to "less fit" members of their own ethnic group.

Social Darwinism was used as one of the excuses for everything from
brutal sweat-shop working conditions for immigrants in America to the
beginings of Apartheid in South Africa.  Social Darwinism is a total
distortion of the princiles about which Charles Darwin wrote.
Attempting to explain or justify any person's or group's social status
based on Social Darwinism is every bit as ignorant a statement as the
creationist's favorite question: "If man is descended from the apes,
why are there stil apes?"

I have not intended this as a flame, but rather as edification.  The
distortions of Darwin's work are legion and just when one seems to
have been laid to rest in one place, it rears its ugly head in another
( I heard on the radio just this morning that YET ANOTHER fight over
the teaching of evolution in public schools here in California is
being started by the creationists .)

Anyone wishing to learn more about Darwin's theories should start at
the source by reading Darwin's work.  Other excellent sources are just
about any works by Steven Jay Gould.

Now, to what I believe ( and hope ) the original poster was REALLY
talking about, that is, the modeling of socio-politico-economic
systems. This seems, at least on the surface, like a reasonable
application of neural nets.  I have heard of some work being done on
modeling the stock market, but have not heard anything about other
types of social science modeling.  These things are quite different
from anything like Social Darwinism, since they model the behavior of
systems without any a priori value judgements as to the supposed
"fitness" of the individual components of the system.

May be some social scientist "out there" can construct a network to
model how asinine beliefs like Social Darwinism spread through a
supposedly intelligent population ( 1/2 :-) )



-- 
Walt Peterson.  Prime - San Diego R&D (Object and Data Management Group)
"The opinions expressed here are my own."