[comp.unix.ultrix] Problem with DECterm under ULTRIX 3.1

wallis@wsucsa.uucp (10/04/89)

        Dear Netlanders:

        Has anyone out there in Netland seen the following problem under
ULTRIX 3.1 running DECWindows?  It seems like when you use your DECterm window
under ULTRIX 3.1 as a VT300+ type terminal to DLOGIN into a VMS machine and
use EDIT/TPU there, that EDIT/TPU and the terminal window are not communicating
correctly.  Also, the PF keys seem to not behave right.  Has anyone else seen
this behavior from there machines?  Any fixes known?  Some of our users use
both ULTRIX and VMS and want the full VT300+ functionality.  I already have 
one rather dumb workaround, which is to set your DECterm to VT100 mode.  Then
things start working, BUT you lose the nice VT300 keyboard, graphics, etc...
This is pestering a lot of my users.


                        Thanks in advance.


                        Tom Wallis

PS> We are running VAXstation 3100s, ULTRIX 3.1, and ULTRIX worksystem software
2.1, and ULTRIX DECnet.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Wallis                          BITNET: WALLIS@TWSUVAX
System Manager, Computer Science Dept. BITNET: TWWALLIS@TWSUVM
Wichita State University               UUCP: uunet!ncrlnk!ncrwic!wsucsa!wallis
Wichita, Ks.  67211 

DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect the
views of the Computer Science Department or Wichita State University.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thomas@mipsbx.Berkeley.EDU (Matt Thomas) (10/06/89)

>         Has anyone out there in Netland seen the following problem under
> ULTRIX 3.1 running DECWindows?  It seems like when you use your
DECterm window
> under ULTRIX 3.1 as a VT300+ type terminal to DLOGIN into a VMS machine and
> use EDIT/TPU there, that EDIT/TPU and the terminal window are not
communicating
> correctly.  Also, the PF keys seem to not behave right.  Has anyone else seen
> this behavior from there machines?  Any fixes known?  Some of our users use
> both ULTRIX and VMS and want the full VT300+ functionality.  I already have 

Do a dlogin node -e# (or some othe character besides ~).  Why not ~?  Because
way on the past of dlogin (probably for rlogin compatibility sake) it was
decided that ~ is the default escape character.  Now what does that have
do with
the above?  Because the Fn keys end their escape sequences with ~ and so dlogin
patiently waits for the next character (to see if you wanted to escape) before
allowing the ~ to pass.

Also make sure that you run in 7-bit controls mode, dlogin does not
handle 8-bit
escape sequences.

-- 
Matt Thomas                     Internet:   thomas@decwrl.dec.com
DECnet-ULTRIX Development       UUCP:       ...!decwrl!thomas
Digital Equipment Corporation   Disclaimer: This message reflects my own
Littleton, MA                               warped views, etc.