mf@ircam.ircam.fr (Michel Fingerhut) (11/04/90)
In article <KAGEYAMA.90Oct31164853@spld2.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp> Tatsuro Kageyama rites: > >Has any body gotten KCl to compile on a DECsystem 5820 running Ultrix 4.0? I did; actually I did compile AKCL (the Austin Kyoto Common Lisp) on a DECsystem 5820 (reduced to 5810 by doctor's orders), Ultrix 4.0. Here is what I did: 1. Get the original KCL distribution (of June 1987), as well as akcl-1-492 (e.g., from cli.com, or from rascal.ics.utexas.edu). 2. Follow the instructions in the akcl README, with the following precisions (assuming you're in the akcl distribution home directory): a. modify line 1 of c/sgi4d_emul.s from #include <sys/regdef.h> to #include <machine/regdef.h> b. Let NAME be "dec3100". c. While modifying h/dec3100.defs, I chose the following values CC = cc -DVOL= -Olimit 798 -G 8 -I${AKCLDIR}/o ... MAINDIR = (my path to the kcl source tree) ... INITFORM=(setq compiler::*cc* "cc -DVOL= -G 0 ")(load "../lsp/setdoc.lsp") d. No modifications to h/dec3100.h were required. e. Proceed as described in the README file. (with thanks to Bill Schelter). Michael Fingerhut IRCAM, Paris (France)
rolfl@humanist.uio.no (Rolf Lindgren) (11/05/90)
I've been able to compile akcl to a dec3100 (it did take som effort - why couldn't they make the dec3100 patches work in the first place?) However, I haven't been able to compile pcl (xerox' clos-implementation). Kcl complaints about stack overflow, dumps core and aborts. Anybody know how to increase kcl's stack (or decrease pcl's use of it?) Rolf Lindgren | "The opinions expressed above are 612 Bjerke Studentheim | not necessarily those of anyone" N-0589 OSLO 5 | rolfl@humanist.uio.no