katcher@netcom.netcom.COM (Jeff Katcher) (05/06/91)
I have been considering purchasing a new DECstation 5000/120, but am holding back due to the stories in the trade rags about DEC handing over Ultrix to SCO. What is the truth? I am an experienced Ultrix developer and am reasonably satisfied with it, but I refuse to have SCO gobbledegook on my workstation (no flames please). Thanks for any information, Jeff Katcher Jeffrey Katcher Home: 408-247-5057 Work: 415-795-6217 EMail: katcher@netcom.COM {apple,claris,amdahl,tandem}!netcom!katcher
mjr@hussar.dco.dec.com (Marcus J. Ranum) (05/08/91)
katcher@netcom.netcom.COM (Jeff Katcher) writes: >I have been considering purchasing a new DECstation 5000/120, but am holding >back due to the stories in the trade rags about DEC handing over Ultrix to >SCO. What is the truth? As you also probably know from the trade rags, DEC is planning on slowly and smoothly transitioning the ULTRIX kernel base to OSF/1, which is a modified mach based kernel. This is the operating system that was recently released as an advanced developer's kit from DEC, and is the basic OSF offering. As part of the ACE initiative, DEC is going to be giving the MIPS reference port of OSF/1 to SCO, who will market it for the ACE platforms. For a lot of reasons, SCO wants to call it SCO, rather than OSF/1, or DEC's port of OSF/1, but it *will* be the basic OSF/1 offering. No doubt everyone will be struggling and competing (as they do now) to "add value" to that basic offering. This doesn't mean that we are pitching ULTRIX - we were planning to transition ULTRIX to an OSF/1 base anyhow - so our strategy stays the same there - we're not out of the operating system business, since we'll still (presumably) be writing device drivers and whatnot. I hope this clears things up some - if you need a more definitive answer, ask your DEC salescritter to get someone who understands ACE and what it's all about to come chat with you. mjr.
mcculley@alien.enet.dec.com (05/11/91)
In article <1991May07.194920.17461@decuac.dec.com>, mjr@hussar.dco.dec.com (Marcus J. Ranum) writes... >katcher@netcom.netcom.COM (Jeff Katcher) writes: >>I have been considering purchasing a new DECstation 5000/120, but am holding >>back due to the stories in the trade rags about DEC handing over Ultrix to >>SCO. What is the truth? > > As you also probably know from the trade rags, DEC is planning on >slowly and smoothly transitioning the ULTRIX kernel base to OSF/1, which >is a modified mach based kernel. This is the operating system that was >recently released as an advanced developer's kit from DEC, and is the >basic OSF offering. As part of the ACE initiative, DEC is going to be >giving the MIPS reference port of OSF/1 to SCO, who will market it for the >ACE platforms. > [...] This doesn't mean that we are pitching ULTRIX - we were planning >to transition ULTRIX to an OSF/1 base anyhow - so our strategy stays the >same there - we're not out of the operating system business, since we'll >still (presumably) be writing device drivers and whatnot. from another point of view, I sure as heck hope we aren't out of the o/s business, that might mean I'd be out of a job! It would certainly mean that there was a fair bit of money and time wasted staffing up and transitioning some engineers into ULTRIX development at the same time that there's folks being laid off as part of our corporate downsizing. I think it's pretty sure that we'd all be put out to pasture if the corporation was getting out of the ULTRIX development business! I can speak from personal firsthand knowledge that there are now more folks working on ULTRIX and OSF/1 put together than there were when that story hit the trade rags, and there'll be more in the (near) future... -lbm