[comp.sys.transputer] i960

braner@TPOT.TN.CORNELL.EDU (Moshe Braner) (09/14/89)

Any info on the difference between the i860 and the new i960?
Actually, the T800 can work on two instructions at once, as long
as the first is an FPU op and the second is not and is not
dependent on the result of the first.  That is a rather strong
point for matrix calculations.  I presume that the i960 is much
further advanced on that line.  Does it have, in a sense, two
copies of the instruction-execution hardware parts to allow
overlapping any two independent instructions?  That would be
parallelism at a new level.  In the future I presume we'll have
CPUs that do 4 ops at once, 8, 16.. :-)
Anyway, what is coming out from Inmos these days as a response?
- Moshe Braner

andy@topologix.UUCP (Andy Pfiffer) (09/14/89)

Excerpted from the 9/11/89 edition of EE Times (without permission):

	Intel Samples 80960CA by Loring Wirbel:

	Intel Corp. tomorrow is announcing engineering samples of the
	80960CA, the first member of its second generation 960 family
	of 32-bit embedded processors.

	The company has been talking about the chip and its architecture
	for at least a year.  The chip is aimed at embedded-controller
	applications and can run through two or more instructions per
	clock cycle, giving it a theoretical peak performance of 66 Mips
	(33 Vax Mips) at 33 MHz.

	The new 960CA will take an aggressive price/performance stab at
	competitors, carrying a tag of $325 for the processor in large
	OEM quantities.

	...

	Wind River Systems and Ready Systems will be major participants
	in the unveiling, announcing ports of their real-time operating
	systems, VXWorks and VRTX32.

Also in the same issue:

	Marked Down Transputer

	SGS-Thomson has decided to slash the going price of its 32-bit
	Transputer to a mere $2 per 1 Mips - one-third that of its former
	basement-level entry.

	...

	The move also demonstrates just how serious the company is about
	driving its microprocessor, still being sold under the Inmos name,
	into high-volume embedded control applications.

	...

	The strategy hopes to attract the attention of potential users who,
	believing the part is suited only to real-time computations in
	parallel-processing environments, have been reluctant to consider
	the Transputer for high-voulme embedded control applications.


Spelling errors, paragraphing, etc. are mine.

The new 860 and the newer 960 were developed about the same time and
share many of the wins/tradeoffs found in each (dual instruction mode,
etc.).

There was also mention of a 2 link T425/T800 compatible 32-bit Transputer
with 2K of on-chip RAM in the Transputer-related article.

--
Andy Pfiffer			  Topologix, Inc. (303) 421-7700
Trillium Diving Team              4860 Ward Road / Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
"...that's the way a Transputer works, right?"

beersm@TPUTER.TN.CORNELL.EDU (Jim Beers) (09/14/89)

VLIW processors do multiple operations at once, this is what the
multiflow machine is, and there is quite a bit of research being
done on this, includeing a project here at Cornell.  Multiflow
gets some incredible proformance this way, but the compilers must
be pretty good.
the i860, quoting 60 mflops is assuming doing an add and multiply
on each cycle.