news@prg.ox.ac.uk (news) (10/04/90)
I can't say I really believe this sort of thing, but since Lindsay Patten asks (in article <1990Oct2.204634.16609@watserv1.waterloo.edu>), at the York OUG meeting the Inmos stand was (at least at the beginning of the meeting) knee deep in uninformative eight-page leaflets called the H1 transputer `product preview'. It really is pretty uninformative, but I can safely assume that it isn't covered by any pledges in blood that I may have made to anyone. The cover says: Instruction set compatible with the IMS T805 [ that seems to mean `binary compatible' and the compatibility mode running is on a per-process basis ] Pipelined superscalar micro-architecture Workspace cache 4Gbyte physical address space 16Kbyte instruction and data cache >150MIPS peak >60MIPS sustained >20MFLOPs peak >10MFLOPs sustained Sub-microsecond interrupt response [ this may be code for `more register banks for fast swaps' ] Per process error handling Enhanced support for pre-emptive schedulers [ or perhaps that is the line that is code for `more register banks' ] Memory protection and address translation Virtual channels Support for message routing 80Mbytes/s total bi-directional link bandwidth [ there are four links, four events, and two control links shown on the block diagram alongside ] Separate control system Single 5MHz clock input 50MHz internal clock Single +5+/-5% power supply The rest of the document (everything says `preliminary' and `we don't promise anything', and is dated September 1990) is, I am told, largely unintelligble unless you already know what it means. Oh, I exaggerate. I'm just trying to get out of typing it all in. I guess the only other thing to say is that all of the links (even the control system links) are of the four-wire style that is being used for the H series communications. There is a C100 link converter which is meant to be out before the H series transputers themselves. They weren't promising anything. Neither am I; errors and imaginings excepted. g