[comp.editors] wq in vi

maart@cs.vu.nl (Maarten Litmaath) (06/19/89)

kannan@cerc.wvu.wvnet.edu (R. Kannan) writes:
\...
\:wq

A dangerous command: in some versions vi does NOT check if the write operation
has been successful, but always quits.
Use `ZZ' or `:x' instead.
Is it time again for the Vi Reference? Followups to comp.editors.
-- 
"I HATE arbitrary limits, especially when |Maarten Litmaath @ VU Amsterdam:
   they're small."  (Stephen Savitzky)    |maart@cs.vu.nl, mcvax!botter!maart

woolsey@nsc.nsc.com (Jeff Woolsey) (06/22/89)

In article <2781@solo8.cs.vu.nl> maart@cs.vu.nl (Maarten Litmaath) writes:
>A dangerous command: in some versions vi does NOT check if the write operation
>has been successful, but always quits.
>Use `ZZ' or `:x' instead.

I cannot let this go by unchallenged.  ZZ is very dangerous if you
used the -r flag on vi, and make no further changes.  It does NOT write
out your file, AND it removes the file in /tmp.  I lost a two-hour
editing session on a new file I was composing that way.  Never again!
-- 
-- 
Qualify nearly everything.

Jeff Woolsey	woolsey@nsc.NSC.COM	+1 408 721-8162