[sci.psychology] human monogamy, feminist primatology

turpin@cs.utexas.edu (Russell Turpin) (11/30/90)

-----
I have no idea where follow-ups (if any) are appropriately directed.
You decide.

-----
In article <1990Nov29.174040.9382@watserv1.waterloo.edu> alternat@watserv1.waterloo.edu (Ann Hodgins) writes:
> I think there is a point to knowing what are instinctive, inherited
> predispositions are - personal unity and integration.  If we know
> ourselves and are honest with ourselves we have a better chance
> of enjoying life.  Doing what comes naturally feels good and acting 
> in sync with our natures is fulfilling. The opposite of this - trying
> to do what does not come naturally, leads to self-deception, internal
> conflict and a joyless life cut off from the roots of pleasure deep
> in our instinctive selves.

"Know yourself."  Certainly good advice.  But are you suggesting
that this question subsumes all problems of what to do and how to 
behave?  If, to take an example from another thread, it is natural
in primates for males to dominate females, does this mean that
we should not try to do things differently in *human* culture?

Within the philosophical tradition -- I know, mostly dead white men,
but that's what I've read -- it has been almost universally accepted
that there might be natural urges that culture should suppress for the
better fulfillment of other natural urges that are judged higher or
more important.  (That this suppresses "personal unity" presumes that
natural urges are always compatible.  This is a very dubious
presumption.  There is no evolutionary reason to think that the
happiest and most integrated primates are best at propagating the
species!)  

The idea that all morality should be a matter of doing what is most
natural is a recurring and radical theme, and unfortunately, one whose
history is opaque to most of its proponents.  It is indeed best to
know ourselves, but there might be areas where that knowledge is held
irrelevant to the goals for which we strive, because we have already
decided there are things more important than whatever comes naturally
in that one area.  In such areas, knowing ourselves might help us
develop better means, even if not select goals. 

Russell