peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) (10/30/90)
In article <6Z0RR1w163w@zitt> joe@zitt (Joe Zitt) writes: > OBEFF: This may be an interesting issue from the communications rights > standpoint. What is the legality-standing of NAMBLA? (Much as I dislike > them, I would tend to hope that their meetings are not outlawed.) How > would this translate to newsgroup validity? How about the allowability of > alt.child-abusers vs alt.child-lovers? How about alt.org.nambla? This associates the group with a recognisable political organisation and divorces it from the alt.sex morass. And I think alt.child-abuse is a pretty reasonable group. I'm not talking about sexual stuff here, though. I'm talking about folks who beat up on their kids. Is there current discussion in some corne of usenet on this topic? Should I do a newgroup? -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' +1 713 274 5180. 'U` peter@ferranti.com