[sci.med.aids] MILITARY VACCINE TESTING

Yo.Yo@p0.f8366.n106.z1.fidonet.org (Yo Yo) (09/19/90)

Here's an update for you and the others who wanted to know more about the 
military vaccine trials:
 
The vaccine is called GP-160. It is in the 2nd year stage of research.
It supposedly delays progression of the virus.  It will start with a series of 
rabie vaccine injections (exactly 5) given in intervals of 7 days.  If no 
change in Tcells then injections of the GP160.  The test is designed for 
individuals who are HIV+ with high Tcell count and show no symptons.  The GP 
160 will be given once every 2 months for first year and then every three 
months thereafter.  The catch is the identical test of AZT where the vaccine 
is the real thing. (Blind study).  He may be getting a placebo and not know 
it. Head honchos in Washington, DC (Walter Reed Army Medical Center) only know 
who gets what. 30 people who participated in the first year study (who ALL 
received the vaccine) and all showed an increase in their t-cell counts.
 
Some people have asked me about WHY they've never heard of this study. All I 
can say is that the military does things in its own way...and they probably 
don't want to publicize their efforts.
 
Anyway, if anyone has heard of GP 160, please let know. I'll keep everyone 
updated as the trial begins in October.

--  
Uucp: ...{gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!106!8366.0!Yo.Yo
Internet: Yo.Yo@p0.f8366.n106.z1.fidonet.org

Wounded.Bird@f38.n135.z1.fidonet.org (Wounded Bird) (09/22/90)

About a year ago I remember a fellow posting here that he was taking part in 
tests of GP-160. He was saying his employer, The IBM Corporation, had actually 
encouraged people to do so. I remember it so well because some jerk popped in 
with why would you want to risk your life for a bunch of perverts and drug 
abusers? God, I was pissed. <grin> This was a civilian study.

Here is what I have on Gp160. There is an entire chapter on vaccine 
development in the National Academy of Sciences publication "Mobilizing 
Against Aids". ( I know everyone must be getting sick of my reference to that 
book but it's the best source or compendium of data I have run accross):

 "The first human trial of an AIDS vaccine was conducted by Daniel Zagury of 
the Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris and his coworkers. They 
demonstrated that a vaccinia-gp160 recombinant virus could induce both 
antibody-mediated and cell-mediated immunity against HIV. The vaccine did not 
produce any side effects other than the localized sore associated with a 
satisfactory immune response to vaccinia."

"Phase 1 clinical trials of a gp160 subunit vaccine began at NIAID in the 
summer of 1987. In January 1988 the trial was expanded to include 6 vaccine 
evaluation units at medical centers around the country....A second U.S. 
vaccine, a vaccinia-gp160 recombinant similar to the Zagury vaccine, is being 
tested by researchers associated with the University of Washington."

"These trials will NOT provide any evidence about vaccine efficacy in human 
beings. Clearly, it would be unethical to challenge recipients with live 
virus. The trials are only designed to answer questions about safety and to 
acquire some preliminary information about the effects of the vaccines on the 
immune system."

"Scientists and reporters who cover science have a responsibilty to make it 
very clear that these trials are preliminary safety trials. They do not signal 
the advent of an effective solution to the AIDS problem. Raising false hopes 
could diminish educational efforts that are essential to control the 
epidemic."

AMEN.....W.B.

--  
Uucp: ...{gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!135!38!Wounded.Bird
Internet: Wounded.Bird@f38.n135.z1.fidonet.org

The.Bird@f38.n135.z1.fidonet.org (The "Bird") (09/26/90)

I found some more info on vaccine development from the same source. It's not 
too encouraging but ya never know what may develop......

"...This concern still exists [variability of the  segment of the HIV genome 
is the coding for the envelope protein] but it has been overshadowed by a much 
more serious problem; repeated virus challenge studies in chimpanzees (using 
HIV) and macaque monkeys (using SIV) have failed to demonstrate that vaccines 
of any kind can protect against infection with these viruses. "

"Vaccines evaluated to date have included a killed whole virus vaccine, a 
variety of subunit vaccines (some containing the HIV envelope protein gp120 
and others containing its precursor gp160), and a vaccinia-gp160 recombinant 
vaccine. In each case the animals were innoculated with a vaccine and then 
challenged with the same virus isolate used to produce the vaccine. All the 
animals developed persistent viral infections. As expected, the chimpanzees 
did not become ill (they do not get AIDS from natural HIV infection), but the 
vaccinated macaques developed AIDS and fared no better than unvaccinated 
controls."

"Studies of the immune functions of the immunized animals before they were 
challenged showed that the vaccines had elicited antibodies and, in some 
cases, a cell-mediated immune response to the HIV or SIV antigens. In fact the 
macaques immunized with killed whole virus had neutralizing antibodies. Upon 
challenge, however, the animals became persistently infected."

--  
Uucp: ...{gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!135!38!The."Bird"
Internet: The."Bird"@f38.n135.z1.fidonet.org