ddodell@stjhmc.fidonet.org (David Dodell) (10/02/90)
AIDS TREATMENT NEWS Issue #111, September 21, 1990 phone 415/255-0588 Vitamin C: Laboratory Tests Indicate Antiviral Effect Cryptosporidiosis: Guarded Progress Managing Your Doctor CARE Act Funding Threatened; Lobbying Help Needed National AIDS Treatment Activist Conference -- Washington, DC, November 10-11 Women Denied AIDS Benefits -- Washington, DC, Protest October 2 National Health Care Day, October 3 San Francisco: Clinical Trials Conference, Saturday, October 6 RISE Health-Education Workshops Begin September 27 VITAMIN C: LABORATORY TESTS INDICATE ANTIVIRAL EFFECT by John S. James A series of laboratory tests at the Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine in Palo Alto, California found that ascorbate (vitamin C) reduced the growth of HIV in cultured human lymphocytes, in concentrations not harmful to the cells. The experimental study, conducted by Steve Harakeh, Ph.D., and Raxit J. Jariwalla, Ph.D., appears in the September issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA; results were also presented September 11 at "Ascorbic Acid: Biological Functions and Relation to Cancer," an international symposium sponsored by the U.S. National Cancer Institute, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, in Bethesda, Maryland. The study is extensive and hard to summarize, but it showed a substantial reduction in measures of viral activity (p24, reverse transcriptase, and syncytia formation) without toxicity to cells at concentrations of 25 to 150 mcg/ml, with the higher concentrations working better. How much vitamin C would be needed to reach these levels in blood serum? This study did not measure blood levels, but the published paper cited measurements by others. One researcher found an average blood level of 28.91 mcg/ml after oral use of 10 grams of vitamin C. Another found that intravenous infusion of 50 grams a day led to a peak plasma level of 796 mcg/ml. Comment This research appears to have been carefully done; many measurements were made and the results all point in the same direction. We raised several questions, however, and gave Dr. Jariwalla a chance to respond. One potential limitation is that this study used cultured cells and viruses, which have been bred in laboratories; recently scientists have learned that viruses and cells freshly obtained from patients can give different, and presumably more reliable, results in drug screening. In our interview, Dr. Jariwalla noted that at this time there is no evidence that strains differ in resistance to ascorbate -- but that different strains have not yet been tested. One question about the usefulness of vitamin C concerns the relatively narrow range between effective and toxic doses found in this study. Effectiveness began to be seen at 25 mcg/ml, but toxicity was found at 400 and above; half or more of the cells were killed by exposure to 400 mcg/ml or greater for four days. The therapeutic range is therefore fairly narrow; for some drugs, the corresponding ratio between effective and toxic doses is a thousand or more, compared to 16 (400 divided by 25) in this laboratory test of vitamin C. Dr. Jariwalla said that "although this may be so, there is no evidence of ascorbate toxicity found in human beings when large doses have been taken. The only side effect of high doses of ascorbate is a mild laxative effect. There are no reliable reports of severe ascorbate toxicity, such as acidosis or kidney stones." Several years ago there was much interest in high-dose vitamin C as an AIDS treatment. By the end of 1987 this interest had greatly diminished, although some people continue to use the treatment today. One reason we have been skeptical of vitamin C is that if the treatment had worked well, it seems unlikely that the community would have stopped using it. Dr. Jariwalla said that interest in vitamin C as a potential AIDS treatment had diminished for several reasons. fFirst, the emphasis shifted to AZT and other nucleoside analogs as antivirals. Second, no clinical trials of vitamin C and AIDS got off the ground. And third, no hard scientific evidence of the effect of ascorbate on the AIDS virus was available until now. At least two clinical trials were proposed years ago by leading AIDS researchers, but no funding was available. The Linus Pauling Institute, which has long been interested in vitamin C, has heard "a number of reports...from AIDS patients who had taken high doses of vitamin C and had experienced a marked improvement in their condition" (quote from a press release accompanying the recently published article). It is possible that results today could be better than those of several years ago, when treatment was only used late in the illness. Today, treatments are started earlier; and AZT and others antivirals make possible combination therapies, which were not available during the time of great interest in vitamin C. The article suggests a rationale for such combinations. We asked Dr. Jariwalla what the study suggested about an appropriate dose of vitamin C. He said other results indicate that at least 10 grams orally would be needed to obtain the minimum blood levels for antiviral effect. Higher doses can be obtained through intravenous infusion, to reach plasma levels in the range found most effective in the laboratory tests. He cautioned, however, that further clinical studies are required to establish the optimum method of administration for maintaining high levels of ascorbate in the blood. Note: large doses of vitamin C are usually taken as a powder, not as pills. We asked about the different forms of the vitamin which are available. The Linus Pauling Institute sent us an information sheet which said that "Vitamin C, from Bronson Pharmaceuticals, La Canada, California, is available in the form of ascorbic acid, sodium ascorbate, calcium ascorbate, or sodium ascorbate and ascorbic acid combination." The sodium or calcium ascorbate salts are used to reduce slight acidity in the urine due to ascorbic acid. Dr. Jariwalla said that for oral use of high doses, the mixture of sodium ascorbate and ascorbic acid should be used -- or calcium ascorbate for persons on a sodium- restricted diet. We suggest that patients discuss vitamin C, or any treatment they are considering, with their physician. A nutritionist told us that some patients have sought treatment for diarrhea, not realizing that it was caused by taking too much vitamin C; until they told their physician that they were using the vitamin, the actual cause of the diarrhea was not suspected. Persons should also realize that suddenly stopping high doses of vitamin C can cause deficiency symptoms, as the body is used to the large amounts and temporarily unable to use the small amounts in the normal diet efficiently. We also called Bonnie Broderick, R.D., M.P.H., who is HIV nutritionist for the early intervention project of the Santa Clara (California) Department of Public Health. She was concerned that large doses of vitamin C could interact with other nutrients, especially vitamin B12 and copper, possibly causing deficiency symptoms of those nutrients. She also referred us to a chart in Nutrition Action Healthletter, October 1987, which listed possible adverse effects of high doses of vitamin C; the chart is based on a book, The Right Dose: How to Take Vitamins and Minerals Safely, by Patricia Hausman, M.S., published by Rodale Press, Emmaus, Pennsylvania, 1987. Because of the possibility of adverse effects, she is not recommending high-dose vitamin C until clinical trials have shown an antiviral effect or other benefit in people. We asked Dr. Jariwalla what he thought would be the next step in organizing studies. (Financing, of course, is a major requirement; the Linus Pauling Institute study was funded by private donations, and by the Japan Shipbuilding Industry Foundation; research grants will be sought for further studies.) Dr. Jariwalla replied that two main avenues are being explored. First, the Linus Pauling Institute is inviting researchers at hospitals, clinics, community-based organizations, etc., to start clinical studies. The Institute itself does not do clinical trials, but can collaborate with others who initiate them. And second, the Linus Pauling Institute has urged the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to undertake clinical studies. Dr. Jariwalla said that "the new evidence provides a strong scientific basis to conduct clinical trials of vitamin C in AIDS." References (1) Harakeh S, Jariwalla RJ, and Pauling L. Suppression of human immunodeficiency virus replication by ascorbate in chronically and acutely infected cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. September 1990; volume 87, pages 7245-7249. CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS: GUARDED PROGRESS by Denny Smith Some quiet developments may be breaking the miasma of research to find an effective treatment for Cryptosporidium parvum infection, which causes severe diarrhea. For background reports on various antibiotics and other approaches, see AIDS TREATMENT NEWS #95 and #107. Following is additional information on some of the drugs discussed in those articles. Diclazuril, Related Developments Diclazuril is a veterinary drug used to treat parasites in chickens, and over a year ago was found to help some people with cryptosporidiosis. Contrary to what we implied in our previous articles, diclazuril is not marketed to U.S. veterinarians, although a number of people have acquired personal supplies from other countries. A version redesigned by the manufacturer, Janssen Pharmaceutica, for human use was tested in recent clinical trials in New York. Rosemary Soave, M.D., reported the results thus far at the Sixth International Conference on AIDS in June. She tested daily doses from 200 mg to 600 mg, and saw the best responses at the higher doses. Even though cryptosporidiosis is usually not a problem outside the gastrointestinal tract, Dr. Soave said that those people who experienced the best response to diclazuril also showed higher levels of the drug in their bloodstream. So Janssen is again reformulating diclazuril to improve absorbability. Trials of the improved compounds are planned, but details have not been released. Meanwhile, Janssen has applied to the Food and Drug Administration for permission to provide compassionate use access to diclazuril. On a speculative note, a pharmacist told us that a close chemical relative of diclazuril, called toltrazuril, is also used for treating parasites in animals. Toltrazuril, a product of Bayer (under the trade name Baycox), is a broad-spectrum anti-protozoal used to treat sheep, poultry, and fish. Like diclazuril (trade name Clinicox), it is marketed in some Latin American countries for veterinary use. We were told that in animal studies, toltrazuril was as safe as diclazuril, and that it is formulated in a liquid more concentrated than the diclazuril powder mixed with poultry feed. However, we know of no human experience with toltrazuril nor of any laboratory data testing it against Cryptosporidium. A veterinarian friend of ours is looking further into toltrazuril, as well as other veterinary drugs which might be able to treat infections in humans. Humatin Success? One of the studies of cryptosporidiosis presented at the Sixth International Conference was a hospital chart review of patients treated with the common anti-parasite drug paromomycin (brand name Humatin); the study found good results (see AIDS TREATMENT NEWS #107, July 20, 1990, page 5). Surprised that an ordinary, available medicine was found useful after years of research into numerous possibilities, we contacted the author of the abstract, Joseph Gathe, M.D., at Park Plaza Hospital in Houston. Dr. Gathe said that he continues to see very good responses to paromomycin in about 90% of his patients with cryptosporidiosis. The improvements include a substantial decrease in the quantity and frequency of diarrhea, and often a decrease in stool counts of the parasite's cysts. This drug is an intraluminal agent, which means it passes through the gastrointestinal tract with little absorption into the bloodstream. Dr. Gathe explained that this characteristic is an advantage for controlling toxicity (none was seen in his patients), but would make the drug useless for treating infections which have disseminated to other body systems. However, drug handbooks caution that if this drug should reach the bloodstream, such as through intestinal ulcers or blockage, it could lead to hearing loss or kidney toxicity or other side effects attributed to large or extended doses of aminoglycoside antibiotics. We consulted three other physicians who have tried paromomycin in the past to treat cryptosporidiosis: two of them had not seen any response. One of the two pointed out that chart reviews can be unreliable methods of drawing conclusions about a treatment because they analyze data retrospectively, without control over variables which a prospective clinical study would eliminate or at least manage. The third was Paula Sparti, M.D., a respected HIV physician in Miami. She has tried paromomycin with her patients diagnosed with cryptosporidiosis, sometimes without any results. But one of her patients responded dramatically within 36 hours after starting paromomycin, at 500 mg given four times daily. His profuse diarrhea completely cleared, and related abdominal pain subsided. Shortly after, a patient treated by an associate of Dr. Sparti's responded similarly to the drug. Dr. Sparti's assessment is that some people, not all, may benefit from paromomycin. She feels that since it is available and safe, people with cryptosporidiosis should be offered a trial. If there is no improvement within 7 to 10 days, the drug can be discontinued. It is possible that some of the differences in response to the drug may result from the difficulty in diagnosing intestinal infections. In the search for a cause of diarrhea or malabsorption, several organisms capable of causing illness might be identified in stool specimens. Other microbes may not be readily found in the specimens, yet be present and causing problems in the intestinal tract. Given these uncertainties, the treatment for diarrhea and resulting weight loss can be hit and miss. If symptoms begin to clear up during the administration of a given drug, such as paromomycin, it might not always be possible to know which organism the drug acted upon, if any. Macrolide Antibiotics? Two other drugs tried so far to treat this infection are spiramycin and clindamycin; there have been positive, but limited, results. Clindamycin is already approved to treat certain infections; spiramycin is an investigational macrolide antibiotic, available through compassionate use. A related drug called azithromycin, approved in Yugoslavia, has strong laboratory activity against another protozoal infection, toxoplasmosis. Human trials to test azithromycin against toxoplasmosis are long overdue. A pilot study testing the drug in MAI infections is already in progress. The manufacturer, Pfizer, Inc., is now working toward FDA approval as a treatment for certain respiratory infections and chlamydia. We have heard that some buyer's clubs are investigating how to increase access to azithromycin in this country. Given azithromycin's broad potential, we wondered about trying it for cryptosporidial infections. We spoke to Shelley Gordon, M.D., an infectious disease specialist in San Francisco who usually tries clindamycin with primaquine to treat cryptosporidiosis, with some success. She noted that her patients with higher helper cells tend to have the best results. We asked her about the logic of trying azithromycin, and she agreed that it is worth considering. A spokesperson for Pfizer told us that they were not aware of any studies suggesting that azithromycin has activity against Cryptosporidium. The safety and availability of paromomycin suggest that it is worth trying for cryptosporidiosis. Diclazuril and its future analogs appear promising, and speedy development could spare many people from resorting to veterinary versions. Azithromycin is a speculative possibility, but it warrants research attention. These drugs, like clindamycin, spiramycin, and hyperimmune milk, may work for some people some of the time. Until one is proven consistently effective, we support aggressive experiments with the reasonable choices at hand. Managing Your Doctor by Michelle Roland Introduction Many patients find themselves dissatisfied with one or more aspects of their relationships with their health care providers. For some, the problem is the amount of time and attention they receive during office appointments or in-patient hospital visits; for other, philosophical differences in treatment approaches leave them feeling misunderstood or unsupported in their decision-making process. Still others find their symptoms undiagnosed and/or untreated for long periods of time. In this article, we will present some suggestions about how to develop a constructive working relationship between patients and their physicians. In order to do this, we will attempt to explain how doctors are trained to think and how you, as a patient, can assist them in their thought process while having your questions answered to your satisfaction. What Kind of Patient Are You? The first step in developing a good relationship with your doctor is to identify the role you wish to play in this relationship. The next step is to find a doctor who feels comfortable working with patients in this way. In order to find such a doctor, you must know what you are looking for. Many people with HIV infection want to work as full partners with their doctors in managing their health. For such people, frank discussions of diagnostic and treatment possibilities are very important. Others would rather have the doctor do most of the thinking about what could be causing the symptoms and how to treat them without being included in this thought process. They would rather play a more passive role and accept the doctor's suggestions without a great deal of interaction. This distinction is most often not quite as clear cut as it may sound. Many people fall somewhere in the middle, wanting to be included in the decision-making process, but not really wanting to know all of the details along the way. For these patients, brief explanations about what the doctor is looking for will suffice, followed with a more in-depth discussion of treatment options once a diagnosis has been made. Determining which role you want to play does not mean that you need to be bound to that role irreversibly. There will be times when you want to know more or less than usual; the challenge will be in identifying those times and being able to communicate your needs to your doctor as they change. Most people, no matter how large a part they want to play in managing their health care, will at times find this role, and the information that comes with it, very scary and threatening. The emotional impact of such information should never be minimized, no matter how active you are in your health care. Finding the Right Doctor for You In addition to determining how active you want to be in your health care relationship, you need to decide the general philosophical approach you think you will want to take in terms of treatments. Some people feel most comfortable following the standard of care in the medical community. At this time, that would include such suggestions as starting AZT when your T- helper cell count has fallen below 500, and prophylaxis for pneumocystis pneumonia if the count falls below 200. Most often, the standard of care includes FDA approved drugs or treatments for which there is much data supporting safety and effectiveness. Other people want to try new treatment approaches which have not yet been proven to be effective. Some recent examples of drugs which fall into this category include compound Q and oral alpha interferon. Some patients want to try new drugs in the context of a clinical trial; others prefer to use them with only their physicians' monitoring and advice. Finding a doctor who is already participating in clinical trials or who is willing to refer you to local trials will be important for patients who want to access potentially effective new treatments in this way. Finding a doctor who is willing to either provide you with largely untested compounds, or monitor you if you get them through another source, will be important if you want to try this approach. Not all doctors feel comfortable participating in the use of unproven drugs with their patients. It is a good idea to determine your doctor's willingness to monitor and support you in this area if you think you may want to try such a drug now or in the future. Many people may want to add non-traditional (in the Western medical model) approaches like acupuncture, Chinese herbs, homeopathy, relaxation/visualization, vitamin therapy, etc., to their health care program. Finding a doctor who is supportive of your total health care approach is important in this case. If you want to use both unproven drugs and adjunctive therapies, you should find out how your doctor feels about each of these concepts. Once you have determined the elements you are looking for in a doctor, you will have to talk about these issues with your current doctor or any new doctor you may be considering. You do have a right to have these conversations with your doctor. Realize, however, that your doctor may not be used to having this kind of discussion with his or her patients. Before launching into the details of the discussion, your doctor might be more open if you tell him or her that you want to talk about philosophy and style and arrange a time to have this discussion; this approach will allow the doctor to schedule the necessary time and prepare to switch gears from the purely medical issues with which she or he may be more comfortable to a frank discussion of partnership. [Note that this article assumes that the patient has a high degree of privilege and accessibility to a variety of doctors from which to choose. The unfortunate reality is that in many of the public health and HMO systems, and in many geographical locations, the patient's ability to choose doctors is very limited. In such cases some of the later suggestions in this article may still be useful, although more difficult to implement.] Time There almost never seems to be enough time in any health care setting, whether private, clinic, HMO (Health Maintenance Organization), or public hospital, although some of these settings are certainly worse than others. This problem will probably never be solved, but it may be helpful to think about a few of the reasons that time always seems unnecessarily limited. In some settings, for example, many HMOs, the doctor essentially has no control over the length of each appointment. You will often find yourself waiting for long periods of time, and feeling very frustrated. Keep in mind, however, that you are most likely waiting because the doctor spent more than the allotted time with other patients. The doctor in this situation is constantly battling conflicting needs: the need to stay on schedule so you don't have to wait too long and the need to spend "extra" time with patients who need medical or emotional attention. A simple solution may seem to be to schedule fewer patients each day. While it is certainly true that some physicians have large practices for financial reasons, more often the physician is again confronted with conflicting needs: to take patients who need a doctor (good HIV doctors are in high demand), to see patients on short notice (how often do you feel frustrated by having to wait days or weeks for an appointment?), and to schedule sufficient time with each patient. In this difficult equation, appointment time is often the loser. In spite of this pessimistic assessment of time, some physicians and offices are better than others about staying on schedule and spending sufficient time with each patient for the patient to feel that his or her needs are being met. When possible, talking to other patients who see a particular doctor is probably the best way to determine how much of a problem scheduling will be. A final comment on time: Often, a fair amount of time is spent thinking about each patient when the patient is not there. A responsible doctor reviews the chart before going in to see the patient, to refresh his or her memory about that patient's history, and then spends some time thinking about what the symptoms mean and how to approach them when they write the chart note after the patient leaves. This fact may not make you feel any better cared for when the doctor seems to be rushed and not giving you the attention you want and need, but it's good to keep it in mind when you are assessing the care you are receiving. Is the care good, even if you don't feel like you are getting enough time? If so, the doctor is probably doing a good job "behind your back." If not, you may need to talk to your doctor about the time issue and other reasons you may not be getting the care you need. How Do Doctors Think? Doctors are trained to think in four main steps. Understanding this thought process can help you learn how to ask questions in a way that will help your doctor think better and provide you with answers to your questions. First, the doctor takes a history, or asks questions about your current complaint and pertinent aspects of your past medical history. At this time, the doctor tends not to examine you, but rather just to talk. This may seem a little awkward, as you may want to show the doctor what it is you are describing. He or she will probably ask you to show where your discomfort is, but will not focus on the physical exam until after asking you as many questions as he or she can think of. This may be an area where people feel cut short or ignored. The doctor is again working with conflicting needs: the need to listen to you and let you talk and the need to keep on schedule. You can help by trying to answer the doctor's questions completely but to the point, and the doctor can help by being attentive to you. Doctors are told all throughout their training that the majority of information they need to make a diagnosis will come from the history, so they should listen well. You can also help in this area by reminding the doctor of important facts of which they may have lost track, like weight loss over an extended period of time, recent and past medication changes, adverse reactions to medications, visits to other doctors, recent lab tests or x-rays that have been ordered, etc. Next, the doctor does a physical exam based on the information from the history. Again, this may seem awkward, because the doctor's thought process has shifted; he or she may not want to talk much while examining you. Some doctors will be able to put you more at ease during the physical by keeping up the conversation. Others may concentrate intently on the exam. Once the doctor has collected the data from the history and physical, he or she makes an assessment, which should take the form of a differential diagnosis. This is the stage where he or she considers all the possible causes for your symptoms and physical signs found during the physical exam. Finally, the doctor decides on a plan to determine which of the possible diagnoses is the correct one and how you should be treated. You can play a crucial role in the last two stages: trying to figure out what is causing the problem and deciding how to treat the problem. This is the thinking that the doctor usually does in his or her own head, or while writing in your chart. If you want to be involved in the process, these are the kinds of questions you can ask: What are the possible diagnoses you are considering to explain my symptoms and physical findings? What makes you consider each of these possibilities? Is there anything else we should be considering? How will we figure out which of these possible diagnoses is the correct one? What tests should we run? How invasive is each test? How expensive? How accurate? Are there some tests we should run more than once (stool samples for ova and parasites, for example)? What are the risks and benefits of each test? In what order should we do these tests? What treatments should I consider at each stage -- before we have a diagnosis, and after we have it figured out? The most important thing you can do to help your doctor think through the problem and to help you feel assured that you are getting the best possible care is to map out a plan with the doctor. What will you do first? If you cannot make a diagnosis after doing that, then what will you do? Then what? Then what? You can go through the same process with treatment possibilities once a diagnosis has been made. What are my treatment options? If I try this and it doesn't work, or the side effects are too bad, then what could I try? Then what? Are there any other medications I can take with the treatment that might make the side effects more tolerable? What side effects should I expect? Following Up Chances are that you will still have questions when you leave the doctor's office or later as you think about all the information you have received. Write your questions and concerns down and bring them with you to your next appointment. Working with an assertive patient can be threatening to even the most enlightened doctor. To soften the "threat," try to validate your doctor and to take his or her needs into consideration. Find something you like about what the doctor is doing before you jump into all your questions and concerns. Tell him or her that you'd like to talk about several issues and that you are aware there may not be time to cover all of them during this appointment. Ask how much time you do have, and if you can schedule another appointment soon to discuss the issues which are not highest priority. Make sure you know what your priorities are so you can have as many of your needs met as possible during each appointment. Finally, ask yourself what questions you always seem to have after an appointment. What consistently frustrates you? Try to take those questions and frustrations and figure out how to talk to your doctor about them so that you can decide together how best to take care of all the parts of you. CARE ACT FUNDING THREAT; LOBBYING HELP NEEDED The Comprehensive AIDS Resource Emergency (CARE) Act of 1990, passed by large majorities in Congress and recently signed into law by President Bush, provides $780 million in emergency impact aid to cities and states heavily affected by the epidemic. But while this bill authorizes the expenditure, the money must also be appropriated in a separate legislative process. On September 12, the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee of Labor, HHS and Education approved a budget plan funding only $110 million of the $780 million authorized -- essentially continuing funding for AZT, but starting no new programs. Part of the remaining funds could be added next year. The original bill, introduced by Senators Edward Kennedy (Democrat -- Massachusetts) and Orrin Hatch (Republican -- Utah), had included $275 million as disaster relief to 16 U.S. cities which have been especially hurt by the decade-long epidemic. In a statement addressing the cut, San Francisco Mayor Art Agnos said, "I understand that we are responding to the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq, but America is also facing its own invasion by a killer virus that is wiping out tens of thousands of lives. . . Today, nine years into the AIDS epidemic, we are still waiting for a meaningful response from Washington." In addition to San Francisco, the cities slated for help were Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Ft. Lauderdale, Houston, Jersey City, Los Angeles, Miami, Newark, New York, Philadelphia, San Diego, San Juan, and Washington, DC. As chair of the AIDS Task Force of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, Agnos sent telegrams to fellow mayors facing the loss, urging them to lobby for support of an amendment by Senator Brock Adams (Democrat -- Washington) to restore full funding of the bill. An editorial in The New York Times, September 14, also called on the Senate Committee on Appropriations to reverse the decision. Senator Adams likened the epidemic to other natural disasters, noting that tornadoes and earthquakes would never have to wait "another year" for a national response. The funding could be restored by the full Committee on Appropriations, by the full Senate, or by the House/Senate conference which will occur later. No one knows when these votes will occur, because the schedule will depend on the current "budget summit" meeting between Congress and the White House. The most important Senators are those on the Committee on Appropriations: Adams, Bumpers, Burdick, Byrd, Cochran, D'Amato, DeConcini, Domenici, Fowler, Garn, Gramm, Grassley, Harkin, Hatfield, Hollings, Inouye, Johnston, Kasten, Kerrey, Lautenberg, Leahy, McClure, Mikulski, Nickles, Reid, Rudman, Sasser, Specter, and Stevens. If you are a resident of any state represented by one of the above Senators, then your call to his or her office will be especially important. Because the legislative picture keeps changing, you might want to call an expert AIDS organization to get current information. Any of the following could help: AIDS Action Council, 202/293-2886; Human Rights Campaign Fund, 202/628-4160; Mobilization Against AIDS, 415/863-4676; or National Minority AIDS Council, 202/544-1076. NATIONAL AIDS TREATMENT ACTIVIST CONFERENCE, WASHINGTON, DC, NOV. 10-11 ACT UP/New York is organizing a national meeting of AIDS treatment activists in Washington, DC, on November 10 and 11, just before the meeting of the ACTG (the AIDS Clinical Trials Group, of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases). The need for the meeting became apparent during work on ddC access issues, when different activist organizations independently started working on the same problem without knowing of each others' involvement. Potential projects include setting up a nationwide "drug buddy" system (in which activists work together to study and track the progress of a particular experimental drug), coordinating efforts on women and AIDS, and developing the "Count Down 18 Months" campaign, suggested by ACT UP/New York, for activists from around the world to campaign and develop research protocols to make all major opportunistic infections truly manageable conditions. For more information, call David Gold, 212/741-7790, or Mike Barr, 212/765-7127. WOMEN DENIED AIDS BENEFITS: WASHINGTON, DC, PROTEST OCTOBER 2 The Women's Caucus of ACT UP/DC is planning a demonstration to be held on Tuesday, October 2, 1990, at the headquarters of the Social Security Administration in Washington, DC. The Social Security Administration is being targeted because of its reliance on the Centers for Disease Control's (CDC) definition of AIDS, which prevents many women with HIV/AIDS from qualifying for Social Security Insurance. Because of the CDC's exclusive definition, 65% of women with HIV/AIDS are unable to qualify for benefits they need to help pay for food, shelter, transportation, or childcare. The CDC's definition of "AIDS" is primarily based on the symptoms and infections seen in white gay men, and ignores the symptoms most often seen in women, such as pelvic inflammatory disease. Individuals who do not show CDC- defined symptoms are denied access to Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security benefits for which they would otherwise qualify. Consequently, women with HIV/AIDS can die before they receive any benefits. AIDS is a leading cause of death for women in New Jersey and New York City, and infection rates are rapidly increasing. ACT UP plans to take action that will dramatize the government's ineffectual response to the needs of women with HIV/AIDS. The demonstration will take place at the Health & Human Services building at the corner of Independence and 3rd Streets SW at 12 noon on October 2, 1990. For more information, call ACT UP/DC at 202/728-7530. NATIONAL HEALTH CARE DAY, OCTOBER 3 At least 87 million people in the United States have either inadequate health insurance or none at all. Those people who can qualify for insurance have watched their premiums skyrocket during recent years, and many are frequently denied reimbursement for experimental, potentially life-saving treatments. Many others can neither qualify for nor afford private insurance, and their numbers have long outgrown the Reagan/Bush allotment for public resources. To exacerbate this situation, millions of dollars a day are now drifting toward a war buildup and away from essential domestic needs, particularly health care programs. On September 12 a $780 million AIDS emergency spending act was slashed to $110 million by a Senate subcommittee, critically jeopardizing an already tardy federal response to AIDS (see article above, on CARE bill funding). AIDS has become the rawest example of a larger, chronic disaster in U.S. health care. Millions of Americans must routinely wait "another year" to receive proper treatment. Jobs with Justice, a national coalition of labor unions and community organizations, is organizing a day of actions for Wednesday, October 3, to spotlight the general crisis of quality, access, and cost of the U.S. health care system, and to demand an equitable, comprehensive, national system of health care for all. Sponsors of "Health Care Action Day" include the Communications Workers of America (CWA), Service Employees International Union (SEIU), and the International Association of Machinists (IAM). So far the cities planning for activities include Atlanta, Birmingham, Boston, Canterbury (New Hampshire), Chicago, Columbus, Denver, Los Angeles, Miami, Nashville, New York, Oklahoma City, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, San Diego, San Francisco, and Seattle. Unions will also hold noontime informational picket lines at their worksites. To contact Jobs With Justice, call 202/728-2395, or 800/4242-USA. ACT UP/Boston has issued a call for ACT UP chapters around the country to participate in this effort with local actions: "ACT/UP Boston urges all groups to seize this opportunity to work with other groups that will be active on this day, and fight back against those who are responsible for the state of our healthcare system." They can be reached at 617/49-ACTUP. SAN FRANCISCO: CLINICAL TRIALS CONFERENCE, SATURDAY, OCTOBER 6 An AIDS patient advocacy group has organized a one-day event to provide information about participating in clinical trials. Besides panel discussions in English and Spanish, there will be tables with personnel from leading research centers to answer questions. The event, "Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Being in an HIV/AIDS Clinical Trial," is Saturday, October 6, from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM, at Davies Medical Center, Castro and Duboce Streets, San Francisco. It is free and open to the public; no registration is required. The facility is wheelchair accessible, and there will be signing for the hearing impaired. Panel discussions include: Trials 101 -- The Basics (11:00 AM to 12:30 PM, with separate panels in English and Spanish); Exploring Options (English, 12:45 to 2:15); Pros and Cons (English 2:30 to 4:00, Spanish 12:45 to 2:15); and Who Has the Power? (English, 2:30 to 4:00). The program is organized by Patient Advocates for Necessary Treatment, and co-sponsored with other organizations including ACT UP/San Francisco Treatment Issues Committee, AIDS Service Providers Association of the Bay Area, Black Coalition on AIDS, Gay Men of Color Consortium, Mission Neighborhood Health Center, Positives Being Positive, Project Inform, Women's AIDS Network, East Bay AIDS Center, and HIV clinical trial sites throughout the Bay Area. RISE HEALTH EDUCATION WORKSHOPS BEGIN SEPTEMBER 27 RISE, a well regarded program for persons with HIV, teaches a meditation-based approach to stress reduction, together with nutrition and other health information. Eight-week courses will begin September 27 in San Francisco, Oakland, and Santa Rosa; for persons located elsewhere, there are courses in other cities, and a self-study manual is available. The program is free except for $10 requested for materials; no one is turned away for lack of funds. A press release from the program's office in Petaluma, California, describes the philosophy as follows: "Underlying the RISE program is the assumption that negative thought processes have become automatic in most persons. To interrupt these often destructive mental and emotional behaviors, individuals need to become more aware of their negative patterns of thinking and acting, while they learn tools to develop beneficial, health supporting alternative patterns." A study presented at the Sixth International Conference on AIDS in San Francisco reported significantly more reduction in depression, anxiety, and hostility scores after RISE training than after traditional psychotherapy, traditional stress management, or no treatment (presentation #Th.B.28). The San Francisco program will be held at Mt. Zion Medical Center; to register call 415/885-7529. For Oakland, call 415/655-3435; for Santa Rose, call 707/571-4167. All three of these programs start on September 27. RISE is also offered in San Diego, CA; Rochester, NY; Toronto, Ontario; Denver, CO; and three cities in Oregon (Portland, Eugene, and La Grande). For more information about the program, or to purchase a self- study manual, send a self-addressed stamped envelope to RISE, P.O. Box 2733, Petaluma, CA 94953, or call the RISE office at 707/765-2758. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona uucp: {gatech, ames, rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!ddodell Bitnet: ATW1H @ ASUACAD FidoNet=> 1:114/15 Internet: ddodell@stjhmc.fidonet.org FAX: +1 (602) 451-1165