ypinn@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (04/06/91)
Apologies, but there appears to be a bug in our Pnews command so that the From: address for my previous message - and probably this one - is marked as ypinn@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca. It should read either craystn@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca {which is the machine the note was sent from}, or you can reach me at ypinn@gauss.clsc.utoronto.ca Thanks bruce pinn
kevin@msa3b.UUCP (Kevin P. Kleinfelter) (04/08/91)
IBM can do this. We were interested because we have an existing SNA network, and needed to let two TCP/IP machines communicate over the existing network. Trouble is that you have to have a 370 to wrap the IP packets AND a 370 to unwrap. We had a 370 on one end of the link, and would have had to put a 370 on the other end -- too expensive! :-) -- Kevin Kleinfelter @ Dun and Bradstreet Software, Inc (404) 239-2347 ...gatech!nanovx!msa3b!kevin Warning: There seem to be multiple 'msa3b' nodes on Usenet, and it is nanoVX, not nanovAx.