ark@rabbit.UUCP (Andrew Koenig) (01/16/84)
How about net.caveat?
liz@umcp-cs.UUCP (01/18/84)
I like net.products. Straight forward and to the point without fencing you into negative comments only. -Liz Allen -- Univ of Maryland, College Park MD Usenet: ...!seismo!umcp-cs!liz Arpanet: liz%umcp-cs@CSNet-Relay
gam@proper.UUCP (Gordon Moffett) (01/19/84)
I vote `yes' for this group (tenatively net.ripoff) but I'd prefer something less editorial than `ripoff', and something less vague than `consumer' -- how about `net.review.product' or some such permutation? SOME information might actually for GOOD products as well as ripoffs. I percieve this as a product review group, rather than a bitch-and-moan/ain't-it-awful kinda thing.