davidg@janus.uucp (David Gaertner) (01/23/88)
Sorry to flame, but isn't this group supposed to have a moderator? Why
is this group filled with garbage articles like requests for reposts
and questions about arc and uudecode? Questions about an article
should be addressed to its author via e-mail, not more news articles.
And other questions belong in comp.sys.ibm.pc.
Network administrators complain enought about comp.binaries.*
newsgroups already, because of the sizes of the articles. So let's try
to cut the junk in this newsgroup. Let's not give them a another
reason to cancel comp.binaries.ibm.pc.
Please, if you want to respond, mail responses to me, or post them to
comp.sys.ibm.pc or some other place, but not here.
/ / David Gaertner
__/ __. , __o __/ ...ucbvax!cory!davidg, davidg@cory.berkeley.edu
(_/_(_/|_\/ <__(_/_ I don't give spare change or go to friendly bible meetings.
chaney@ms.uky.edu (Daniel Chaney) (01/25/88)
davidg@janus.uucp (David Gaertner) writes: >Sorry to flame, but isn't this group supposed to have a moderator? Why >is this group filled with garbage articles like requests for reposts >and questions about arc and uudecode? I agree 100%. Comp.binaries.ibm.pc should include just that - binaries. Requests, discussions and problems should be put anywhere *but* this group. When I see '80 articles in comp.binaries.ibm.pc',I tend to expect 80 binary files. Such was not my luck. >Please, if you want to respond, mail responses to me, or post them to >comp.sys.ibm.pc or some other place, but not here. And if you do feel the urge to flame David in e-mail, throw some heat my way because he's not the only that feels this way. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dan Chaney chaney@ms.uky.edu EXT698@UKCC Disclaimer : What I say is my business, what you read, yours. EOSubject. "Write if you hang by your thumbs"