paf@unixprt.UUCP (Paul Fronberg) (03/18/88)
I think the present state of this group is a strong argument for moderation. Of the last 20 messages posted in this group, I counted: 2 - contained binaries. 1 - contained a `bug report' 5 - contained complaints about the noise level 11 - contained noise articles better left in comp.sources.d At 10%, the need for moderation seems extreme. PS Sorry about contributing to the problem, but hopefully another complaint will help...
rickc@pogo.TEK.COM (Rick Clements) (03/21/88)
In article <302@unixprt.UUCP> paf@unixprt.UUCP (Paul Fronberg) writes: >[..] >At 10%, the need for moderation seems extreme. Most of the noise is discussion about should we have a moderator. I would like to just drop the discussion about a moderator, so most of the noise will go away. >PS Sorry about contributing to the problem, but hopefully another complaint > will help... me too.