RWMIRA01@ULKYVX.BITNET (Rob Miracle) (04/27/88)
For those of you who missed the message first time around: POST discussions about binaries to COMP.BINARIES.IBM.PC.D <--------- NOTE THE .D From now on lets only see Binaries in comp.binaries.ibm.pc. The discussion topic was created last week and no one has posted to it. I think that anyone posting a non-binary to comp.binaries.ibm.pc after May 1, 1988 should recieive the title: Computer Bozo Elite *** Flame off *** Rob Miracle RWMIRA01@ULKYVX.BITNET
davidsen@steinmetz.ge.com (William E. Davidsen Jr) (04/27/88)
We are one hop off the backbone (uunet & philabs) and have no such
group. I have had a message from a backbone manager stating that the
group will be created as soon as this group becomes moderated. Why ask
for postings to a group which doesn't seem to exist? And when it exists
this group will be moderated and no action will be needed, so what's the
fuss?
--
bill davidsen (wedu@ge-crd.arpa)
{uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -memurillo@sigi.Colorado.EDU (Rodrigo Murillo) (04/27/88)
In article <8804270250.AA05739@jade.berkeley.edu> RWMIRA01@ULKYVX.BITNET (Rob Miracle) writes: [edited] >POST discussions about binaries to COMP.BINARIES.IBM.PC.D <--------- >NOTE THE .D >From now on lets only see Binaries in comp.binaries.ibm.pc. The discussion >topic was created last week and no one has posted to it. My site does not have that group available, and maybe I am not the only one. If anybody out there can notify the news gods, maybe there is a problem getting the control message out. I have never had a problem being notified about new groups, but this one does not exist here. I'll talk to the sysadmins here and see whats up. In the meantime, post something to it. -- _______________________________________________________________________________ Rodrigo Murillo, University of Colorado - Boulder (303) 761-0410 murillo@boulder.colorado.edu | ..{ncar|nbires}!boulder!murillo ( Machines have less problems. I'd like to be a machine. -- Andy Warhol )
dor@beach.cis.ufl.edu (Doug Oosting) (04/28/88)
We don't have it either. (Oh no, now there's gonna be a string of "we too" messages! :) -- "Don't worry Charlie, | Douglas Oosting, University of Florida I've got an angle!" | dor@beach.cis.ufl.edu --L.Sternn, _Heavy Metal_ | ...!ihnp4!codas!uflorida!beach.cis.ufl.edu!dor Disk-lay-mer: Does anybody think that the University CARES about my opinions?
boneill@hawk.ulowell.edu (SoftXc Coordinator) (04/28/88)
In article <5672@sigi.Colorado.EDU> murillo@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Rodrigo Murillo) writes: >In article <8804270250.AA05739@jade.berkeley.edu> RWMIRA01@ULKYVX.BITNET (Rob Miracle) writes: [Discussion about posting to comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d] > >My site does not have that group available, and maybe I am not the only one. >If anybody out there can notify the news gods, maybe there is a problem >getting the control message out. I have never had a problem being notified >about new groups, but this one does not exist here. I'll talk to the >sysadmins here and see whats up. In the meantime, post something to it. >-- >_______________________________________________________________________________ > Rodrigo Murillo, University of Colorado - Boulder (303) 761-0410 Here is the message I received from Gene Spafford, on creating comp.binaries.ib.pc.d: From spaf@purdue.edu Fri Apr 22 10:55:41 1988 Received: by hawk.ulowell.edu; id AA17538; Fri, 22 Apr 88 10:55:24 est Received: from uther.cs.purdue.edu by arthur.cs.purdue.edu; (5.54/3.16) id AA19718; Thu, 21 Apr 88 21:46:14 EST Received: from localhost by uther.cs.purdue.edu (3.2/SMI-3.0DEV3) id AA06409; Thu, 21 Apr 88 21:46:10 EST Message-Id: <8804220246.AA06409@uther.cs.purdue.edu> To: boneill@hawk.ulowell.edu (SoftXc Coordinator) Cc: backbone@rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Creation of comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 20 Apr 88 08:45:52 EDT. <8804201345.AA22772@hawk.ulowell.edu> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 88 21:45:52 EST From: Gene Spafford <spaf@purdue.edu> I'll create the group sometime in the next couple of days. [Rest of message concerning moderation deleted, summed up in Rahul Dhesi's posting] -spaf +dr ------END OF MESSAGE------ As you see, Mr. Spafford has benn notified, and will send the control message. I await eagerly for the group to be created. ============================================================================ Brian O'Neill, MS-DOS Software Exchange Coordinator ArpaNet: boneill@hawk.ulowell.edu UUCP : {(backbones),harvard,rutgers,et. al.}!ulowell!hawk!boneill
wfp@dasys1.UUCP (William Phillips) (04/29/88)
In article <8804270250.AA05739@jade.berkeley.edu> RWMIRA01@ULKYVX.BITNET (Rob Miracle) writes: |For those of you who missed the message first time around: | |POST discussions about binaries to COMP.BINARIES.IBM.PC.D <--------- | |NOTE THE .D | |From now on lets only see Binaries in comp.binaries.ibm.pc. The discussion |topic was created last week and no one has posted to it. Well, golly, big fella, I got news for you. comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d does NOT exist at my site! So sue me. Or flame me >/dev/null. -- William Phillips {allegra,philabs,cmcl2}!phri\ Big Electric Cat Public Unix {bellcore,cmcl2}!cucard!dasys1!wfp New York, NY, USA !!! JUST SAY "NO" TO OS/2 !!!