george@idis.UUCP (George Rosenberg) (01/26/84)
I just noticed the two new newsgroups "pgh.general" and "pgh.food". Previously there were no group names of the form "pgh.all". I think that the time is appropriate to begin a local Pittsburgh network. Even if the number of articles posted is low, having the mechanism in place is valuable. I seem to have missed any discussion in "net.news.group" concerning its creation. I believe that would have been the appropriate procedure. I think that the name "pgh.misc" would have been more appropriate than "pgh.general". I also believe that one group should suffice, until a need for a specialized group such as "pgh.food" is demonstrated. George Rosenberg idis!george