[comp.software-eng] Cubicles vs. offices

bobb@cognos.uucp (Bob Barr) (02/01/88)

I appreciate your dilemma.  About 2 years ago our company
planned to build a new building, which we now inhabit.  It was
announced that the "open office" concept was to be used.  This
is the architectural propaganda for "cubicles -- no offices".  I
was certain that the distraction factor would drive down my
productivity, and that of everyone who worked for me.  Hence, I
did a little research at 2 local university libraries, trying to
locate studies done on the issue of how cubicles/offices affect
productivity.  What I found -- mostly in architectural journals
-- addresses your questions and frustration.  Briefly, the
studies collectively seem to conclude that:

>  "open offices" are good for clerical workers, particularly
secretaries, who need to see a lot of people during their day,
and who don't do much work that requires intense concentration.
>  open offices are poor for the morale of all workers,
particularly because they feel a lack of privacy.
>  the major factor that determines people's degree of
satisfaction with their work environment is how much physical
space they have (or appear to have -- a good illusion often
helping immensely, which I can attest to since I have begun
sitting beside a large window.
>  the major reasons for adopting an open-office concept are
cost-saving reasons: 1) it is cheaper to light an open office
because the wiring is simpler and the diffusion effect from
central lights reduces the number of individual lighting units
needed, 2) it is cheaper to heat (and air-condition) cubicled
offices, because there is less ductwork that needs to be
installed in the building and air circulates more freely -- no
doubt a major consideration here in the Great White North, and
3) it is allegedly cheaper to maintain the furnishings with
cubicles, because (in the long run) when the need to change how
the work areas are laid out occurs, cubicles can be dismantled
and re-shuffled much more easily that knocking down walls and
putting up new ones.
>  No one mentions the tax advantages.  I know nothing about the
tax situation myself.

No one in the studies I looked at tackles the issue of
productivity for professional workers head-on -- probably
because of the difficulty in measuring white-collar
productivity.  They hint that it is counter-productive for
people who need to concentrate, and that people leave their
desks a lot to gain privacy, but no one seems willing to try to
measure how much disgruntlement affects productivity.

About a year ago I changed jobs and departments.  I had to move
into a smaller workspace (another cubicle).  Since I had less
storage space for documents, I was forced to throw out all the
articles I had gathered on this subject, so I can't give you my
bibliography.  It may help you to know, however, that there are
articles out there in architectural journals on this subject.

By the way, I presented all my findings to the person in charge
of designing the new building.  It was ignored. 

I wish you well in convincing your people that cubicles are a
mistake.