warner@arrayb.uucp (Dave Warner) (01/20/91)
I've retrieved the descriptions of these tools from the AT&T Toolchest and am wondering if anyone has any experience using them??? ncsl is pretty straightforward - it counts non-commented source lines and generates some statistics. reltools claims to be a software reliability analyzer and, since I haven't read the referenced book, I don't have much to go on. paisley claims to be an executable specification language intended for real time and distributed systems. I would be grateful for any actual experience using any of these tools, especially paisley and reltools. Thanks in advance, Dave -- _____________________________________________________________________ | Dave Warner | e-mail address: warner@intellistor.com | | Intellistor, Inc. | USmail address: 2402 Clover Basin Dr. | | (303)682-6555 | Longmont, CO 80503 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
alan@tivoli.UUCP (Alan R. Weiss) (01/27/91)
In article <1991Jan20.051925.22353@arrayb.uucp> warner@arrayb.uucp (Dave Warner) writes: >I've retrieved the descriptions of these tools from the AT&T Toolchest >and am wondering if anyone has any experience using them??? ncsl >is pretty straightforward - it counts non-commented source lines and >generates some statistics. reltools claims to be a software reliability >analyzer and, since I haven't read the referenced book, I don't have >much to go on. paisley claims to be an executable specification >language intended for real time and distributed systems. I would be >grateful for any actual experience using any of these tools, especially >paisley and reltools. > >Thanks in advance, Dave >-- > _____________________________________________________________________ > | Dave Warner | e-mail address: warner@intellistor.com | > | Intellistor, Inc. | USmail address: 2402 Clover Basin Dr. | > | (303)682-6555 | Longmont, CO 80503 | > --------------------------------------------------------------------- I second Dave's request. Also, how does one go about *getting* the AT&T Toolchest? Does anyone have any experience with software quality analyzers for object-oriented systems? For perl? I am referring to source code analyzers that measure complexity, reliability, etc. Somehow, I don't think PC-Metric fits the object-oriented paradigm, and I don't think they have a perl version ... .-------------------------------------------------------. | Alan R. Weiss | | Manager, QA and Mfg. _______________________________| | Tivoli Systems, Inc. | These thoughts are yours for | | Austin, Texas, US | the taking, being generated | | 512-794-9070 | by a program that has failed | | alan@tivoli.com | the Turing Test. *value!=null;| |_______________________________________________________| |#include "std.disclaimer" --- Your mileage may vary! | .-------------------------------------------------------.