[net.micro] Copyright by CompuServe??

emv@umix.UUCP (Edward Vielmetti) (05/12/86)

Morris Jones (mojo@kepler.UUCP) reports that CompuServe has explicitly
reserved copyright to all information that you get from them, and that
you may not copy or retransmit said information.

I am not doubting his authority (after all he's a sysop there), but
I do doubt the legality of this approach.  What it seems to mean to me
is that any software that I have written that I upload to CompuServe
I lose my rights to; that whatever I say on a CompuServe forum I assign
CompuServe the exclusive rights to, ad nauseum.

As a sysop, I for one will abide by this rule for what it's worth: nil.

(c) 1986 Edward M. Vielmetti, All rights reserved.
(Actually, I'm doing this at work, so it's probably (c) The Regents
of the University of Michigan, though they don't know that.)

emv%Umich-MTS.Mailnet@MIT-Multics.ARPA

phil@portal.UUcp (Phil Sih) (05/15/86)

In article <138@umix.UUCP>, emv@umix.UUCP (Edward Vielmetti) writes:
> Morris Jones (mojo@kepler.UUCP) reports that CompuServe has explicitly
> reserved copyright to all information that you get from them, and that
> you may not copy or retransmit said information.
> 
> I am not doubting his authority (after all he's a sysop there), but
> I do doubt the legality of this approach.  What it seems to mean to me
> is that any software that I have written that I upload to CompuServe
> I lose my rights to; that whatever I say on a CompuServe forum I assign
> CompuServe the exclusive rights to, ad nauseum.
> 
> As a sysop, I for one will abide by this rule for what it's worth: nil.
> 
> (c) 1986 Edward M. Vielmetti, All rights reserved.
> (Actually, I'm doing this at work, so it's probably (c) The Regents
> of the University of Michigan, though they don't know that.)
> 
> emv%Umich-MTS.Mailnet@MIT-Multics.ARPA

Comments welcome on this:

I would guess one of the reasons organizations like Compuserve, BIX, and
others say they own what you write, upload, etc., is because they regard
themselves in the business of reselling your information and have perhaps
taken their cues from the publishing world.

Many people regard the special interest groups on Cserve as their greatest
source of equity (and customers) and it would only seem 'human nature' for
them to want to protect it and keep it to themselves.

As I see it, this can't work in reality.  Suppose one of their users says
something rude regarding someone else and that person decides to sue. Odds
are that Cserve would be the first to disown responsibility for that 
ostensibly 'owned' piece of writing. The same could be said for programs,
or whatever now on their system.  It is probably just a matter of time
before they run into this problem.  Then we will see what happens to their
claims to ownership of users' transmissions.

What might seem more sensible would be a model of ownership more like that
of a bulletin board, where the sysop doesn't have any particularly acknowledged
right to the material uploaded to or entered into his board, nor does he
bear any specific liability. (Although the Tcimpidis case and others would
contradict this.) But I mean by stated agreement.

Opinions anyone?

       Phil Sih at Portal Communications Company, Cupertino, CA
	
   	 	 {lll-crg,ihnp4}!hoptoad!portal!phil
       		   lll-lcc!vecpyr!atari!portal!phil
          	        ucbvax!sun!portal!phil

CC.GALVIN@R20.UTEXAS.EDU (Pete Galvin) (05/17/86)

According to my recent COMPUSERVE newsletter (a letter therein), CompuServe
is claiming just that...that all postings there are theirs.  As I understand
it (no, I'm not a lawyer), they can only claim the rights to the COLLECTION
as a whole, since they DON'T own the rights to all of the parts (programs,
etc).  As such, anyone can use any individual part(s) of the collection,
but not the whole thing.

At any rate, I doubt very strongly that they would have any recourse
at all if I downloaded a program from them in which the author claims
copyright (and allows free use of the program) and then uploaded it
to my favorite local bboards.

I haven't the foggiest if they can claim rights to any generic text a
user posts to their SIGs (i.e. no explicit copyright), as in the
list of patches to DOS 3.2, etc.

						--Pete
-------

JAZBO%BROWNVM.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU (James H. Coombs) (05/17/86)

One cannot copyright information.
Acknowledge-To: James H. Coombs <JAZBO@BROWNVM>

jmc@ptsfa.UUCP (05/19/86)

Perhaps the simplest way of bypassing CompuServe's copyright claim is 
to mark anything that you post with a 'public domain' or copyright 
notice of your own and explicitly allow copying. In their magazine, 
they stated that anything marked to allow distribution was ok to 
distribute.  Their attitiude is that the poster owns the work and that, 
strictly speaking, posting a copy is not equivalent to allowing 
unlimited redistribution. (Naturally they want everyone to pay them 
connect time fees for downloading files rather than make copies 
locally :-) 

-- 
voice= 415 823-2441
uucp={ihnp4,dual,qantel}!ptsfa!jmc

che@ptsfb.UUCP (05/24/86)

In article <931@brl-smoke.ARPA> CC.GALVIN@R20.UTEXAS.EDU (Pete Galvin) writes:
>According to my recent COMPUSERVE newsletter (a letter therein), CompuServe
>is claiming just that...that all postings there are theirs....
>
>At any rate, I doubt very strongly that they would have any recourse
>at all if I downloaded a program from them in which the author claims
>copyright (and allows free use of the program) and then uploaded it
>to my favorite local bboards.
Actually, I think most authors (who are careful about copyrighting
their software before it goes out for general distribution) would
find it interesting to see Compuserve try to sue for damages.  Since
they have no rights to the original work, I would think they are
not in a position to seek recourse.

Compuserve is just trying to "scare" you into downloading
on their time, although I doubt they are very serious about this.
They have a reasonable service, although I do most of my downloads
from GE's GENIE now.  Only $5/hour for 1200 baud.... Much better
than $6.50/hour for 300 baud..... (So there, CS..)
-- 
Mitch Che	Pacific Bell
---------------------------------------
disclaimer, disclaimer, disclaimer, too
(415) 823-2438	uucp: {ihnp4,dual}!ptsfa!ptsfb!che