rcd@ico.ISC.COM (Dick Dunn) (08/05/89)
A couple of weeks ago I asked what PostScript printers there are based on the Canon SX print engine other than the Apple LaserWriter (tm) II NT (and NTX). I said explicitly that I wanted a PostScript printer from the start, not something like a LaserJet II plus add-on hardware/firmware. (Motiva- tion, for those who missed the original posting: I like the SX quality and the packaging and all, but I personally dislike Apple's industry politics and current lawsuits, and their recently-announced intention to move away from Adobe in what sounds like an NIH game to produce yet another proprietary printer interface.) I got a handful of responses, all suggesting the QMS PS-810. Comments on that printer were uniformly positive. It's said to be faster than the NT. It comes with 2 Mb (like the NT) but allows for an upgrade to 3 Mb. It's also somewhat more expensive than the NT, although still under $4000. I'm not sure just how much under; that will depend on local dealers and who- knows-what-else. One of my wishes was for a Centronics interface, which the QMS has. Yes, I know that this parallel interface is not (usually) bidirectional, and a PostScript printer really wants to talk as well as listen. But I want the parallel interface for the high-volume data toward the printer; I can use a serial interface for the back channel (I hope). I don't want to "fly blind". This is going on an AT, though, so I don't want to send files via a serial connection if I can help it since the parallel connection is about an order of magnitude faster. -- Dick Dunn rcd@ico.isc.com uucp: {ncar,nbires}!ico!rcd (303)449-2870 ...Simpler is better.