[comp.lang.postscript] "Compatibility"

dhosek@linus.claremont.edu (Don Hosek) (01/13/91)

In article <89493019@bfmny0.BFM.COM>, tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) writes:
> If you are starting from scratch, you can buy an NEC or Texas
> Instruments PostScript printer with HP emulation also built in.

Be wary about this. If one is doing sophisticated HP usage, it
turns out that most "compatibles" fail the test. A couple years
back, a university in England tested all the so-called
compatibles and found that only the genuine HP machines passed
the test. If you're tempted to get a clone of anything, make sure
that you try before you buy. 

-dh

---
Don Hosek   To retrieve files from ymir via the    | dhosek@ymir.claremont.edu
            mailserver, send a message to          | Quixote TeX Consulting
            mailserv@ymir.claremont.edu with a     | 714-625-0147
            line saying send [DIRECTORY]FILENAME 
            where DIRECTORY is the FTP directory (sans "anonymous") and 
            FILENAME is the filename, e.g. "send [tex]00readme.txt". There is
            a list of files in each directory under the name 00files.txt
            Binary files are not available by this technique.

tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) (01/13/91)

In article <1991Jan12.223851.1@linus.claremont.edu> dhosek@linus.claremont.edu (Don Hosek) writes:
>In article <89493019@bfmny0.BFM.COM>, tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) writes:
>> If you are starting from scratch, you can buy an NEC or Texas
>> Instruments PostScript printer with HP emulation also built in.
>
>Be wary about this. If one is doing sophisticated HP usage, it
>turns out that most "compatibles" fail the test. A couple years
>back, a university in England tested all the so-called
>compatibles and found that only the genuine HP machines passed
>the test. If you're tempted to get a clone of anything, make sure
>that you try before you buy. 

Detailed discussion of HP emulations is not really a PostScript topic.
Nevertheless...

 1. The overall quality of HP emulations has gone up in the last couple 
of years.  There is adequate technical documentation for everyone to be
sure what behavior is required, and the LaserJet clone market has
blossomed.  Whatever clone printers some English academics were able to
procure in 1988, you probably couldn't buy today.

 2. I have a TI PS35 sitting right here.  I have thrown all the HP files
I know of at it, and it behaves exactly like a LaserJet Series II.
There may be some lurking quirks, but I can't find them with normal use.

 3. Nor is the average user likely to find any, simple because, given
the choice of PostScript or HP at the flick of a button, most complex
jobs are much better done with PostScript.  HP is for when you HAVE to
be a LaserJet for someone's hardcoded program or preformatted file.

-- 
A doubled signature is the devil's work. ** Tom Neff <tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM>
-- 
A doubled signature is the devil's work. ** Tom Neff <tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM>

woody@chinacat.Unicom.COM (Woody Baker @ Eagle Signal) (01/15/91)

In article <56449549@bfmny0.BFM.COM>, tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) writes:
> In article <1991Jan12.223851.1@linus.claremont.edu> dhosek@linus.claremont.edu (Don Hosek) writes:
> of years.  There is adequate technical documentation for everyone to be
> sure what behavior is required, and the LaserJet clone market has
> blossomed.  Whatever clone printers some English academics were able to


There are still significant problems with Version 47.0a and 47.0c
Adobe HP emulations.

One of the really intersting things that I found on the version 38.0
hp interpreter in the PS-JET product, was the behavior of the code that
sets the number of lines per inch.  The HP documentation implies that you
can set this to any number.  Under the Adobe emulation, you can.  If you
say you have 66 lines per inch, it does 66 lines per inch.  On a true HP,
however, there are restrictions.  If you say 66 lines per inch, you get
6 lines per inch.  Indeed, it appears that the HP emulation obeys only
discreet values for LPI.

Cheers
Woody